Selle V, Schalkwijk S, Vázquez G H, Baldessarini R J
International Consortium for Bipolar Disorder Research, McLean Hospital, Belmont, Massachusetts, USA.
Pharmacopsychiatry. 2014 Mar;47(2):43-52. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1363258. Epub 2014 Feb 18.
Optimal treatments for bipolar depression, and the relative value of specific drugs for that purpose, remain uncertain, including agents other than antidepressants.
We searched for reports of placebo-controlled, monotherapy trials of mood-stabilizing anticonvulsants, second-generation antipsychotics, or lithium for acute major depressive episodes in patients diagnosed with type I or II bipolar disorder and applied random-effects meta-analysis to evaluate their efficacy, comparing outcomes based on standardized mean drug-placebo differences (SMD) in improvement, relative response rates (RR), and number-needed-to-treat (NNT).
We identified 24 trials of 10 treatments (lasting 7.5 weeks, with ≥ 50 collaborating sites/trial) that met eligibility criteria: lamotrigine (5 trials), quetiapine (5), valproate (4), 2 each for aripiprazole, olanzapine, ziprasidone, and 1 each for carbamazepine, lithium, lurasidone, and olanzapine-fluoxetine. Overall, pooled drug-over-placebo responder-rate superiority (RR) was moderate (29% [CI: 19-40%]), and NNT was 8.2 (CI: 6.4-11). By SMD, apparent efficacy ranked: olanzapine + fluoxetine ≥ valproate > quetiapine > lurasidone > olanzapine, aripiprazole, and carbamazepine; ziprasidone was ineffective, and lithium remains inadequately studied. Notably, drugs were superior to placebo in only 11/24 trials (5/5 with quetiapine, 2/4 with valproate), and only lamotrigine, quetiapine and valproate had > 2 trials. Treatment-associated mania-like reactions were uncommon (drugs: 3.7%; placebo: 4.7%).
Controlled trials of non-antidepressant treatments for bipolar depression remain scarce, but findings with olanzapine-fluoxetine, lurasidone, quetiapine, and perhaps carbamazepine and valproate were encouraging; lithium requires adequate testing.
双相抑郁症的最佳治疗方法以及特定药物在此方面的相对价值仍不明确,这其中也包括抗抑郁药以外的药物。
我们检索了关于心境稳定剂类抗惊厥药、第二代抗精神病药或锂盐用于治疗Ⅰ型或Ⅱ型双相情感障碍患者急性重度抑郁发作的安慰剂对照单药治疗试验报告,并应用随机效应荟萃分析来评估它们的疗效,基于改善情况的标准化平均药物 - 安慰剂差异(SMD)、相对有效率(RR)和需治疗人数(NNT)比较结果。
我们确定了10种治疗方法的24项试验(持续7.5周,每项试验有≥50个协作点)符合入选标准:拉莫三嗪(5项试验)、喹硫平(5项)、丙戊酸盐(4项),阿立哌唑、奥氮平、齐拉西酮各2项,卡马西平、锂盐、鲁拉西酮各1项,以及奥氮平 - 氟西汀联合治疗1项。总体而言,汇总的药物相对于安慰剂的有效率优势(RR)为中等(29%[CI:19 - 40%]),NNT为8.2(CI:6.4 - 11)。按SMD计算,明显疗效排名为:奥氮平 + 氟西汀≥丙戊酸盐>喹硫平>鲁拉西酮>奥氮平、阿立哌唑和卡马西平;齐拉西酮无效,锂盐的研究仍不充分。值得注意的是,仅11/24项试验中药物优于安慰剂(喹硫平5/5项试验,丙戊酸盐2/4项试验),且只有拉莫三嗪、喹硫平和丙戊酸盐有>2项试验。与治疗相关的类躁狂反应并不常见(药物组:3.7%;安慰剂组:4.7%)。
双相抑郁症非抗抑郁药治疗的对照试验仍然很少,但奥氮平 - 氟西汀、鲁拉西酮、喹硫平,可能还有卡马西平和丙戊酸盐的研究结果令人鼓舞;锂盐需要进行充分测试。