Suppr超能文献

头孢洛林酯治疗有效性和安全性的大型回顾性评估

Large retrospective evaluation of the effectiveness and safety of ceftaroline fosamil therapy.

作者信息

Casapao Anthony M, Davis Susan L, Barr Viktorija O, Klinker Kenneth P, Goff Debra A, Barber Katie E, Kaye Keith S, Mynatt Ryan P, Molloy Leah M, Pogue Jason M, Rybak Michael J

机构信息

Anti-Infective Research Laboratory, Pharmacy Practice Department, Eugene Applebaum College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA.

出版信息

Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014 May;58(5):2541-6. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02371-13. Epub 2014 Feb 18.

Abstract

Ceftaroline has been approved for acute bacterial skin infections and community-acquired bacterial pneumonia. Limited clinical experience exists for use outside these indications. The objective of this study was to describe the outcomes of patients treated with ceftaroline for various infections. Retrospective analyses of patients receiving ceftaroline ≥72 h from 2011 to 2013 were included. Clinical and microbiological outcomes were analyzed. Clinical success was defined as resolution of all signs and symptoms of infection with no further need for escalation while on ceftaroline treatment during hospitalization. A total of 527 patients received ceftaroline, and 67% were treated for off-label indications. Twenty-eight percent (148/527) of patients had bacteremia. Most patients (80%) were initiated on ceftaroline after receipt of another antimicrobial, with 48% citing disease progression as a reason for switching. The median duration of ceftaroline treatment was 6 days, with an interquartile range of 4 to 9 days. A total of 327 (62%) patients were culture positive, and the most prevalent pathogen was Staphylococcus aureus, with a frequency of 83% (271/327). Of these patients, 88.9% (241/271) were infected with methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). Clinically, 88% (426/484) achieved clinical success and hospital mortality was seen in 8% (40/527). While on ceftaroline, adverse events were experienced in 8% (41/527) of the patients and 9% (28/307) were readmitted within 30 days after discharge for the same infection. Patients treated with ceftaroline for both FDA-approved and off-label infections had favorable outcomes. Further research is necessary to further describe the role of ceftaroline in a variety of infections and its impact on patient outcomes.

摘要

头孢洛林已被批准用于治疗急性细菌性皮肤感染和社区获得性细菌性肺炎。在这些适应症之外使用的临床经验有限。本研究的目的是描述接受头孢洛林治疗各种感染的患者的治疗结果。纳入了对2011年至2013年接受头孢洛林治疗≥72小时的患者的回顾性分析。分析了临床和微生物学结果。临床成功定义为在住院期间接受头孢洛林治疗时,感染的所有体征和症状均得到缓解,且无需进一步升级治疗。共有527例患者接受了头孢洛林治疗,其中67%的患者接受了超适应症治疗。28%(148/527)的患者发生了菌血症。大多数患者(80%)在接受另一种抗菌药物治疗后开始使用头孢洛林,48%的患者称疾病进展是换药的原因。头孢洛林治疗的中位持续时间为6天,四分位间距为4至9天。共有327例(62%)患者培养结果为阳性,最常见的病原体是金黄色葡萄球菌,频率为83%(271/327)。在这些患者中,88.9%(241/271)感染了耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)。临床上,88%(426/484)的患者取得了临床成功,8%(40/527)的患者出现了医院死亡。在接受头孢洛林治疗期间,8%(41/527)的患者出现了不良事件,9%(28/307)的患者在出院后30天内因同一感染再次入院。接受头孢洛林治疗FDA批准的感染和超适应症感染的患者均取得了良好的治疗结果。有必要进行进一步的研究,以进一步描述头孢洛林在各种感染中的作用及其对患者治疗结果的影响。

相似文献

4
Off-label use of ceftaroline fosamil: A systematic review.头孢洛林酯氨噻肟酸的超说明书使用:系统评价。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2019 Nov;54(5):562-571. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2019.06.025. Epub 2019 Jul 3.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验