Williams Kristina A, Terry Kathryn L, Tworoger Shelley S, Vitonis Allison F, Titus Linda J, Cramer Daniel W
Obstetrics and Gynecology Epidemiology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America ; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Obstetrics and Gynecology Epidemiology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America ; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America ; Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 13;9(2):e88334. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088334. eCollection 2014.
To examine single nucleotide polymorphism (SNPs) in MUC16 (CA125) and MUC1 (CA15.3) in relation to ovarian cancer risk and survival.
We genotyped germline variants of MUC16 (rs2547065, rs1559168, rs12984471, rs2121133) and MUC1 (rs2070803, rs4072037, rs1045253) using samples collected from 758 ovarian cancer cases and 788 controls enrolled in the New England Case-Control Study between 2003 and 2008. We calculated age-adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for disease risk using unconditional and polytomous logistic regression and hazard ratios (HR) for survival using Cox proportional hazard ratios. In a subset of cases, we compared log-normalized CA125 values by genotype using generalized linear models.
Cases homozygous for the variant allele of MUC16 SNP, rs12984471, had poorer overall survival (log-rank p = 0.03) and higher CA125 levels, especially cases over age 65 (p = 0.01). For MUC1 SNP, rs4072037, women homozygous for the G variant had a non-significantly decreased risk for serous invasive types but elevated risk for serous borderline tumors, mucinous borderline and invasive tumors, and endometrioid tumors. Women with the variant allele of MUC16 SNP, rs2547065, especially those who were homozygous had an elevated risk for ovarian cancer; but this association was not confirmed in an independent dataset.
This targeted screen of seven polymorphisms of MUC16 and MUC1 genes failed to identify and confirm effects on ovarian cancer risk overall. However, there may be effects of MUC16 rs12984471 on survival and MUC1 rs4072037 on risk for histologic types of ovarian cancer other than invasive serous. Further study is warranted.
研究黏蛋白16(MUC16,即癌抗原125,CA125)和黏蛋白1(MUC1,即癌抗原15.3,CA15.3)中的单核苷酸多态性(SNP)与卵巢癌风险及生存的关系。
我们使用2003年至2008年期间参与新英格兰病例对照研究的758例卵巢癌病例和788例对照的样本,对MUC16(rs2547065、rs1559168、rs12984471、rs2121133)和MUC1(rs2070803、rs4072037、rs1045253)的种系变体进行基因分型。我们使用无条件和多分类逻辑回归计算疾病风险的年龄调整优势比(OR)和95%置信区间(CI),并使用Cox比例风险比计算生存的风险比(HR)。在一部分病例中,我们使用广义线性模型按基因型比较对数标准化的CA125值。
MUC16 SNP rs12984471的变异等位基因纯合的病例总体生存率较差(对数秩检验p = 0.03)且CA125水平较高,尤其是65岁以上的病例(p = 0.01)。对于MUC1 SNP rs4072037,G变异纯合的女性浆液性浸润型风险无显著降低,但浆液性交界性肿瘤、黏液性交界性和浸润性肿瘤以及子宫内膜样肿瘤的风险升高。MUC16 SNP rs2547065的变异等位基因女性,尤其是纯合子,患卵巢癌的风险升高;但在独立数据集中未证实这种关联。
对MUC16和MUC1基因的7个多态性进行的靶向筛查未能确定并证实对总体卵巢癌风险的影响。然而,MUC16 rs12984471可能对生存有影响,MUC1 rs4072037可能对除浸润性浆液性以外的卵巢癌组织学类型的风险有影响。有必要进行进一步研究。