Suppr超能文献

创伤中心的无监管过度扩张破坏了基于人群的伤害控制的成本效益。

Unregulated proliferation of trauma centers undermines cost efficiency of population-based injury control.

机构信息

From the Department of Surgery, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida.

出版信息

J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014 Mar;76(3):576-9; discussion 579-81. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000125.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

We evaluated the impact on coverage and regional cost of trauma care produced by the activation of a Level II center with no preceding needs analysis in an established trauma region with a Level I center.

METHODS

Patient deidentified trauma registry data for years 2010, 2011, and 2012 were analyzed to assess the effect on trauma service volume during a period at the midpoint of which the Level II center was activated. Trends for each year were evaluated by patient volume, mechanism, resource use as reflected in a transfer to the intensive care unit (ICU) and ICU stay, patient severity as defined by Injury Severity Score (ISS), and patient injury profile determined by mean body region Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) score.

RESULTS

Between 2010 and 2011, during which the Level II opened, overall volume at the Level I center dropped by 3.7%, and blunt volume remained unchanged. From 2011 to 2012, overall Level I volume dropped by 9.4%, and blunt injury fell by 14%. Proportions requiring immediate operating room or ICU care did not change. ISS distribution at the Level I center across the years was similar. Head, chest, and abdominal injuries, as assessed by AIS body region, increased slightly in severity and decreased in volume by 25%, 17%, and 18%, respectively. For 2012, the new center publically reported treating 1,100 patients, which, in concert with the Level I decrease, translates to increasing regional trauma center access by 25% while increasing expense of necessary core personnel by 217%.

CONCLUSION

Addition of a second trauma center in a stable region, in which injury incidence was actually decreasing, doubled the cost of personnel, one of the most expensive components of the trauma system and decreased the volume of injuries necessary for training and education. Trauma system expansion must be based on needs assessment, which assures system survival and controls societal cost.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Economic & value-based evaluation, level III.

摘要

背景

我们评估了在一个已经建立了一级创伤中心的创伤区域中,启动二级中心而没有事先进行需求分析,对创伤救治覆盖范围和区域成本的影响。

方法

分析了 2010 年、2011 年和 2012 年患者去识别创伤登记数据,以评估在二级中心启动期间对创伤服务量的影响。通过患者数量、机制、反映在转入重症监护病房(ICU)和 ICU 停留时间的资源利用、损伤严重程度(ISS)定义的患者严重程度以及通过平均身体区域损伤严重程度评分(AIS)评分确定的患者损伤特征,评估每年的趋势。

结果

在二级中心开放的 2010 年至 2011 年期间,一级中心的总体容量下降了 3.7%,钝性容量保持不变。2011 年至 2012 年期间,一级中心的总体容量下降了 9.4%,钝性损伤下降了 14%。需要立即进行手术室或 ICU 护理的比例没有变化。一级中心的 ISS 分布在各年相似。通过 AIS 身体区域评估,头部、胸部和腹部损伤的严重程度略有增加,体积分别减少了 25%、17%和 18%。2012 年,新中心公开报告治疗了 1100 名患者,这与一级中心的下降相结合,意味着区域创伤中心的访问量增加了 25%,而必要核心人员的费用增加了 217%。

结论

在一个稳定的区域增加第二个创伤中心,实际上降低了创伤发生率,使人员成本增加了一倍,而人员成本是创伤系统中最昂贵的组成部分之一,同时减少了培训和教育所需的伤害量。创伤系统的扩展必须基于需求评估,这可以确保系统的生存并控制社会成本。

证据水平

经济和基于价值的评估,三级。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验