Suppr超能文献

基于视频的行为干预后的临床皮肤检查结果:一项随机临床试验分析。

Clinical skin examination outcomes after a video-based behavioral intervention: analysis from a randomized clinical trial.

机构信息

School of Public Health and Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

Queensland Cancer Council, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

JAMA Dermatol. 2014 Apr;150(4):372-9. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2013.9313.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Older men are at risk of dying of melanoma.

OBJECTIVE

To assess attendance at and clinical outcomes of clinical skin examinations (CSEs) in older men exposed to a video-based behavioral intervention.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This was a behavioral randomized clinical trial of a video-based intervention in men aged at least 50 years. Between June 1 and August 31, 2008, men were recruited, completed baseline telephone interviews, and were than randomized to receive either a video-based intervention (n = 469) or brochures only (n = 461; overall response rate, 37.1%) and were again interviewed 7 months later (n = 870; 93.5% retention).

INTERVENTIONS

Video on skin self-examination and skin awareness and written informational materials. The control group received written materials only.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Participants who reported a CSE were asked for the type of CSE (skin spot, partial body, or whole body), who initiated it, whether the physician noted any suspicious lesions, and, if so, how lesions were managed. Physicians completed a case report form that included the type of CSE, who initiated it, the number of suspicious lesions detected, how lesions were managed (excision, nonsurgical treatment, monitoring, or referral), and pathology reports after lesion excision or biopsy.

RESULTS

Overall, 540 of 870 men (62.1%) self-reported a CSE since receiving intervention materials, and 321 of 540 (59.4%) consented for their physician to provide medical information (received for 266 of 321 [82.9%]). Attendance of any CSE was similar between groups (intervention group, 246 of 436 [56.4%]; control group, 229 of 434 [52.8%]), but men in the intervention group were more likely to self-report a whole-body CSE (154 of 436 [35.3%] vs 118 of 434 [27.2%] for control group; P = .01). Two melanomas, 29 squamous cell carcinomas, and 38 basal cell carcinomas were diagnosed, with a higher proportion of malignant lesions in the intervention group (60.0% vs 40.0% for controls; P = .03). Baseline attitudes, behaviors, and skin cancer history were associated with higher odds of CSE and skin cancer diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

A video-based intervention may increase whole-body CSE and skin cancer diagnosis in older men.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

anzctr.org.au Identifier: ACTRN12608000384358.

摘要

重要性

老年男性有死于黑色素瘤的风险。

目的

评估在接受基于视频的行为干预的老年男性中进行临床皮肤检查(CSE)的就诊情况和临床结局。

设计、地点和参与者:这是一项针对至少 50 岁男性的基于视频的干预措施的行为随机临床试验。2008 年 6 月 1 日至 8 月 31 日,招募男性完成基线电话访谈,然后随机分为接受基于视频的干预组(n=469)或仅接受宣传册组(n=461;总体反应率,37.1%),并在 7 个月后再次接受访谈(n=870;93.5%保留率)。

干预措施

关于皮肤自我检查和皮肤意识的视频和书面信息材料。对照组仅接受书面材料。

主要结果和测量

报告进行了 CSE 的参与者被问及 CSE 的类型(皮肤斑点、部分身体或全身)、谁发起了 CSE、医生是否注意到任何可疑病变,如果有,如何处理病变。医生填写了一份病例报告表,其中包括 CSE 的类型、谁发起了它、检测到的可疑病变数量、病变的处理方式(切除、非手术治疗、监测或转诊)以及病变切除或活检后的病理报告。

结果

总体而言,在接受干预材料后,870 名男性中有 540 名(62.1%)自我报告进行了 CSE,其中 321 名(59.4%)同意医生提供医疗信息(266 名中有 266 名[82.9%])。两组任何 CSE 的就诊率相似(干预组 436 名中的 246 名[56.4%];对照组 434 名中的 229 名[52.8%]),但干预组的男性更有可能自我报告全身 CSE(436 名中的 154 名[35.3%]与对照组中的 118 名[27.2%];P=0.01)。诊断出 2 例黑色素瘤、29 例鳞状细胞癌和 38 例基底细胞癌,干预组恶性病变比例较高(60.0%比对照组的 40.0%;P=0.03)。基线态度、行为和皮肤癌史与 CSE 和皮肤癌诊断的可能性更高相关。

结论和相关性

基于视频的干预措施可能会增加老年男性的全身 CSE 和皮肤癌诊断率。

试验注册

anzctr.org.au 标识符:ACTRN12608000384358。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验