Fish E N, Hannigan G E, Banerjee K, Williams B R
Research Institute, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Virology. 1988 Jul;165(1):87-94. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(88)90661-7.
The interaction of IFN-alpha and IFN-gamma on the induction of antiviral, growth inhibitory, and (2-5)A synthetase activities was investigated in T98G and A549 cells. Synergistic or inhibitory effects which were host-cell dependent were seen with both simultaneous and sequential IFN treatments. Interestingly, IFN-gamma 1 pretreatment affected the levels of IFN-alpha-induced (2-5)A synthetase activity differently in the two cell types. In T98G cells, sequential treatment resulted in an overall decrease in induction of enzyme activity that was not observed in A549 cells. Receptor binding assays and measurements of steady-state mRNA levels indicated that this effect of IFN-gamma pretreatment does not occur at the level of either receptor expression or induction of transcription of the low-molecular-weight form of (2-5)A synthetase.
在T98G和A549细胞中研究了α干扰素(IFN-α)和γ干扰素(IFN-γ)在诱导抗病毒、生长抑制及(2-5)A合成酶活性方面的相互作用。同时和序贯给予干扰素治疗时,均可观察到宿主细胞依赖性的协同或抑制作用。有趣的是,IFN-γ 1预处理对两种细胞类型中IFN-α诱导的(2-5)A合成酶活性水平的影响不同。在T98G细胞中,序贯治疗导致酶活性诱导总体下降,而在A549细胞中未观察到这种情况。受体结合试验和稳态mRNA水平测量表明,IFN-γ预处理的这种作用并非发生在受体表达或低分子量形式的(2-5)A合成酶转录诱导水平。