• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单中心经静脉导线拔除术的20年经验。

Twenty-year experience of transvenous lead extraction at a single centre.

作者信息

Gomes Sean, Cranney Gregory, Bennett Michael, Li Annette, Giles Robert

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Prince of Wales Hospital and University of New South Wales, Sydney 2031, Australia

Department of Cardiology, Prince of Wales Hospital and University of New South Wales, Sydney 2031, Australia.

出版信息

Europace. 2014 Sep;16(9):1350-5. doi: 10.1093/europace/eut424. Epub 2014 Feb 19.

DOI:10.1093/europace/eut424
PMID:24554523
Abstract

AIMS

Indications for cardiovascular implantable electronic devices continue to evolve, which has led to an increasing requirement for transvenous lead extraction. We explore the indications, complications, and success rates involved in the removal of pacemaker and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) leads in a high-volume centre, over 20 years.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We performed a retrospective analysis of all consecutive patients undergoing transvenous lead extraction by a single operator at a single centre between 1993 and 2012. Patient characteristics, indications, and outcomes were analysed. A total of 1006 leads were removed from 510 patients. Seventy-two per cent of patients were males. The mean age was 64 years (range 14-96). Indications included systemic infection (25%), pocket infection (40%), lead failure (26%), chronic pain (3%), and other (6%). Ninety-six per cent of leads were completely removed. There was one procedure-related death, and the major complication rate was 0.3%. Infection was the only identified predictor of increased complication (χ² for difference between groups 20, P< 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Pacing and ICD leads can be safely extracted with mechanical techniques. The presence of device infection appears to be the major predictor of procedural complications.

摘要

目的

心血管植入式电子设备的适应证不断演变,这导致经静脉导线拔除的需求日益增加。我们在一个高容量中心对20多年来起搏器和植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)导线拔除的适应证、并发症及成功率进行了探讨。

方法与结果

我们对1993年至2012年间在单一中心由单一操作者进行经静脉导线拔除的所有连续患者进行了回顾性分析。分析了患者特征、适应证及结果。共从510例患者中拔除了1006根导线。72%的患者为男性。平均年龄为64岁(范围14 - 96岁)。适应证包括全身感染(25%)、囊袋感染(40%)、导线故障(26%)、慢性疼痛(3%)及其他(6%)。96%的导线被完全拔除。有1例与手术相关的死亡,主要并发症发生率为0.3%。感染是唯一确定的并发症增加的预测因素(组间差异χ²为20,P < 0.0001)。

结论

采用机械技术可安全拔除起搏导线和ICD导线。设备感染的存在似乎是手术并发症的主要预测因素。

相似文献

1
Twenty-year experience of transvenous lead extraction at a single centre.单中心经静脉导线拔除术的20年经验。
Europace. 2014 Sep;16(9):1350-5. doi: 10.1093/europace/eut424. Epub 2014 Feb 19.
2
Predictors of 30-day and 1-year mortality after transvenous lead extraction: a single-centre experience.经静脉导线拔除术后 30 天和 1 年死亡率的预测因素:单中心经验。
Europace. 2014 Aug;16(8):1218-25. doi: 10.1093/europace/eut410. Epub 2014 Feb 25.
3
Lead-Dependent Infective Endocarditis: The Role of Factors Predisposing to Its Development in an Analysis of 414 Clinical Cases.铅依赖型感染性心内膜炎:在414例临床病例分析中易患因素对其发病的作用
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2015 Jul;38(7):846-56. doi: 10.1111/pace.12615. Epub 2015 Mar 27.
4
Large, single-center, single-operator experience with transvenous lead extraction: outcomes and changing indications.经静脉导线拔除术的大型单中心单术者经验:结果与适应证的变化
Heart Rhythm. 2008 Apr;5(4):520-5. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2008.01.009. Epub 2008 Jan 17.
5
Evolution in transvenous extraction of pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator leads using a mechanical dilator sheath.使用机械扩张鞘进行经静脉拔除起搏器和植入式心脏复律除颤器导线的技术进展
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2012 Jul;35(7):834-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2012.03385.x. Epub 2012 Apr 5.
6
Laser assistance for extraction of chronically implanted endocardial leads: infectious versus noninfectious indications.激光辅助拔除长期植入的心内膜导线:感染性与非感染性适应证
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2006 Dec;29(12):1352-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2006.00547.x.
7
Safety and effectiveness of transvenous extraction of pacemaker and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads in patients under or over 80 years of age.经静脉取出起搏器和植入式心脏复律除颤器导线在 80 岁以下和 80 岁以上患者中的安全性和有效性。
Kardiol Pol. 2013;71(2):130-5. doi: 10.5603/KP.2013.0005.
8
Is the transvenous extraction of cardioverter-defibrillator leads more hazardous than that of pacemaker leads?经静脉取出心脏转复除颤器导线是否比取出起搏器导线更危险?
Kardiol Pol. 2010 Aug;68(8):884-90.
9
Late complications of electrotherapy - a clinical analysis of indications for transvenous removal of endocardial leads: a single centre experience.电疗的晚期并发症 - 经静脉心内膜导线取出适应证的临床分析:单中心经验。
Kardiol Pol. 2013;71(4):366-72. doi: 10.5603/KP.2013.0064.
10
Single-operator experience with a mechanical approach for removal of pacing and implantable defibrillator leads.单操作医生经验用于起搏和植入式除颤器导线的机械取出。
Europace. 2009 Nov;11(11):1505-9. doi: 10.1093/europace/eup222. Epub 2009 Aug 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Effective and safe mechanical transvenous lead extraction in a low-volume center.在低容量中心进行有效且安全的经静脉导线机械取出术。
Heart Rhythm O2. 2024 Aug 2;5(9):639-643. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2024.07.015. eCollection 2024 Sep.
2
Lead Break during Extraction: Predisposing Factors and Impact on Procedure Complexity and Outcome: Analysis of 3825 Procedures.拔牙过程中的断铅:诱发因素及其对手术复杂性和结果的影响:对3825例手术的分析
J Clin Med. 2024 Apr 18;13(8):2349. doi: 10.3390/jcm13082349.
3
Assessment of the impact of organisational model of transvenous lead extraction on the effectiveness and safety of procedure: an observational study.
评估经静脉导线拔除术的组织模型对程序的有效性和安全性的影响:一项观察性研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Dec 29;12(12):e062952. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062952.
4
Occluded vein as a predictor for complications in non-infectious transvenous lead extraction.闭塞静脉作为非感染性经静脉导线拔除并发症的预测指标
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Oct 4;9:1016657. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1016657. eCollection 2022.
5
A 37-Year-Old Woman with Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy with a Dual-Chamber Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Requiring Percutaneous Transvenous Lead Extraction and Multidisciplinary Management.一位 37 岁女性,患有肥厚型心肌病,合并使用双腔植入式心律转复除颤器,需要行经皮经腔静脉心脏电复律除颤器导线拔除术和多学科管理。
Am J Case Rep. 2021 Oct 22;22:e932073. doi: 10.12659/AJCR.932073.
6
Transvenous Lead Extraction without Procedure-Related Deaths in 1000 Consecutive Patients: A Single-Center Experience.1000 例连续患者经静脉导线拔除术:无相关程序死亡的单中心经验。
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2021 Aug 5;17:445-459. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S318205. eCollection 2021.
7
Transvenous lead extraction on uninterrupted anticoagulation: A safe approach?在持续抗凝治疗下经静脉拔除导线:一种安全的方法?
Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2021 Jul-Aug;21(4):201-206. doi: 10.1016/j.ipej.2021.05.006. Epub 2021 May 19.
8
Cardiac implantable electronic device infection: Does the device need to be extracted?心脏植入式电子设备感染:该设备需要取出吗?
J Arrhythm. 2020 Mar 12;36(3):493-497. doi: 10.1002/joa3.12326. eCollection 2020 Jun.
9
Transvenous lead extraction with laser reduces need for femoral approach during the procedure.经静脉导线拔除术联合激光可减少术中股静脉入路的需求。
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 29;14(4):e0215589. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215589. eCollection 2019.
10
Transvenous Lead Extractions: Current Approaches and Future Trends.经静脉导线拔除:当前方法与未来趋势。
Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2018 Aug;7(3):210-217. doi: 10.15420/aer.2018.33.2.