Suppr超能文献

在低容量中心进行有效且安全的经静脉导线机械取出术。

Effective and safe mechanical transvenous lead extraction in a low-volume center.

作者信息

Li Lin, Busija Anna, Feng Han, Pandey Amitabh C, Le Jemtel Thierry, Wanna Bassam G

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana.

Department of Medicine, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana.

出版信息

Heart Rhythm O2. 2024 Aug 2;5(9):639-643. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2024.07.015. eCollection 2024 Sep.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Transvenous lead extraction (TLE) of cardiac implantable electronic devices was once deemed highly risky by high-volume centers. However, advancements in technology have significantly reduced the risk, making TLE a safer procedure in electrophysiology.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to examine the efficacy and safety of mechanical TLEs in a low-volume center with a single operator.

METHODS

This study retrospectively accessed electronic medical records from the Tulane University School of Medicine system in New Orleans, Louisiana, and included patients who received mechanical TLE from 2016 to 2023. We analyzed the indications for TLE, patient characteristics, lead characteristics, success rate, and complications.

RESULTS

We included 149 consecutive mechanical TLEs with an average implant duration of 105 months. A total of 53.7% (80) of TLEs were indicated for infectious reasons, and 37.6% (56) were high-voltage leads. Clinical success and complete procedural success rates were both 94.6% with no procedure-related mortality or major complications. The periprocedural mortality rate was 1.25% (1). Minor complications included a left chest pocket hematoma, a left groin hematoma, and urinary retention.

CONCLUSION

The efficacy and safety of mechanical TLEs performed in a low-volume center are comparable with those in high-volume centers.

摘要

背景

心脏植入式电子设备的经静脉导线拔除术(TLE)曾被高容量中心认为风险极高。然而,技术的进步已显著降低了风险,使TLE在电生理学中成为一种更安全的手术。

目的

本研究的目的是在一个低容量中心由一名操作者检查机械TLE的有效性和安全性。

方法

本研究回顾性查阅了路易斯安那州新奥尔良市杜兰大学医学院系统的电子病历,纳入了2016年至2023年接受机械TLE的患者。我们分析了TLE的适应证、患者特征、导线特征、成功率和并发症。

结果

我们纳入了149例连续的机械TLE,平均植入时间为105个月。共有53.7%(80例)的TLE是由于感染原因进行的,37.6%(56例)是高压导线。临床成功率和手术完全成功率均为94.6%,无手术相关死亡或重大并发症。围手术期死亡率为1.25%(1例)。轻微并发症包括左胸袋血肿、左腹股沟血肿和尿潴留。

结论

在低容量中心进行的机械TLE的有效性和安全性与高容量中心相当。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19ee/11524931/152fefc0ba18/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验