Robinson Paul, Barrett Barbara, Bateman Anthony, Hakeem Az, Hellier Jennifer, Lemonsky Fenella, Rutterford Clare, Schmidt Ulrike, Fonagy Peter
Division of Psychiatry, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
BMC Psychiatry. 2014 Feb 21;14:51. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-14-51.
The NOURISHED study: Nice OUtcomes for Referrals with Impulsivity, Self Harm and Eating Disorders.Eating Disorders (ED) and Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) are both difficult to treat and the combination presents particular challenges. Both are associated with vulnerability to loss of mentalization (awareness of one's own and others' emotional state). In BPD, Mentalization Based therapy (MBT) has been found effective in reducing symptoms. In this trial we investigate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of MBT adapted for Eating disorders (Mentalization Based Therapy for Eating Disorders (MBT-ED)) compared to a standard comparison treatment, Specialist Supportive Clinical Management (SSCM-ED) in patients with a combination of an Eating Disorder and either a diagnosis of BPD or a history of self-harm and impulsivity in the previous 12 months.
METHODS/DESIGN: We will complete a multi-site single-blind randomized controlled trial (RCT) of MBT-ED vs SSCM-ED. Participants will be recruited from three Eating Disorder Services and two Borderline Personality Disorder Services in London. Participants allocated to MBT-ED will receive one year of weekly group and individual therapy and participants allocated to SSCM-ED will receive 20 sessions of individual therapy over 1 year. In addition, participants in both groups will have access to up to 5 hours of dietetic advice. The primary outcome measure is the global score on the Eating Disorders Examination. Secondary outcome measures include total score on the Zanarini BPD scale, the Object Relations Inventory, the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales, quality of life and cost-effectiveness. Measures are taken at recruitment and at 6 month intervals up to 18 months.
This is the first Randomised Controlled Trial of MBT-ED in patients with eating disorders and symptoms of BPD and will provide evidence to inform therapy decisions in this group of patients. During MBT-ED mentalization is encouraged, while in SSCM-ED it is not overtly addressed. This study will help elucidate mechanisms of change in the two therapies and analysis of therapy and interview transcripts will provide qualitative information about the conduct of therapy and changes in mentalization and object relations.
ISRCTN51304415.
“滋养”研究:冲动、自我伤害和饮食失调转诊患者的良好结局。饮食失调(ED)和边缘性人格障碍(BPD)都难以治疗,二者并存更是带来了特殊挑战。这两种疾病都与心理化缺失(对自身和他人情绪状态的认知)的易感性有关。在边缘性人格障碍中,基于心理化的治疗(MBT)已被证明在减轻症状方面有效。在本试验中,我们将研究针对饮食失调调整后的基于心理化的治疗(MBT-ED)与标准对照治疗——专科支持性临床管理(SSCM-ED)相比,对患有饮食失调且在过去12个月内有边缘性人格障碍诊断或自我伤害及冲动史的患者的有效性和成本效益。
方法/设计:我们将完成一项MBT-ED与SSCM-ED的多中心单盲随机对照试验(RCT)。参与者将从伦敦的三个饮食失调服务机构和两个边缘性人格障碍服务机构招募。分配到MBT-ED组的参与者将接受为期一年的每周一次的团体和个体治疗,分配到SSCM-ED组的参与者将在1年内接受20次个体治疗。此外,两组参与者都将获得最多5小时的饮食建议。主要结局指标是饮食失调检查的总体评分。次要结局指标包括赞纳里尼边缘性人格障碍量表总分、客体关系量表、抑郁焦虑压力量表、生活质量和成本效益。在招募时以及长达18个月的时间里,每6个月进行一次测量。
这是第一项针对患有饮食失调和边缘性人格障碍症状患者的MBT-ED随机对照试验,将为该组患者的治疗决策提供依据。在MBT-ED中鼓励心理化,而在SSCM-ED中则未明确提及。本研究将有助于阐明两种治疗方法的改变机制,对治疗和访谈记录的分析将提供有关治疗实施以及心理化和客体关系变化的定性信息。
ISRCTN51304415。