1 Department of Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Mar;202(3):W263-9. doi: 10.2214/AJR.13.11061.
The purpose of this study was to compare prostate cancer detection rate of real-time elastography (RTE) with that of multiparametric MRI to evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of the two methods.
Thirty-nine patients with biopsy-proven prostate cancer underwent both RTE and multiparametric MRI to localize prostate cancer before radical prostatectomy. RTE was performed to assess prostate tissue elasticity, and hard lesions were considered suspicious for prostate cancer. Multiparametric MRI included T2-weighted MRI, diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI), and contrast-enhanced MRI (CE-MRI) with an endorectal coil at 1.5 T. After radical prostatectomy, whole-mount step sections of the prostate were generated, and the prostate cancer detection rates with both modalities were analyzed for cancer lesions measuring 0.2 cm3 or larger.
Histopathologic examination revealed 61 cancer lesions. RTE depicted 39 of 50 cancer lesions (78.0%) in the peripheral zone and 2 of 11 (18.2%) in the transitional zone. Multiparametric MRI depicted 45 of 50 cancer lesions (90.0%) in the peripheral zone and 8 of 11 (72.7%) in the transitional zone. Significant differences between the two modalities were found for the transitional zone and anterior part in prostates with volumes greater than 40 cm3 (p<0.05). Detection rates for high-risk prostate cancer (Gleason score≥4 and 3) and cancer lesions with volumes greater than 0.5 cm3 were high for both methods (93.8% and 80.5% for RTE, 87.5% and 92.7% for multiparametric MRI). Volumetric measurements of prostate cancer were more reliable with T2-weighted MRI than with RTE (Spearman rank correlation, 0.72 and 0.46).
RTE and multiparametric MRI depicted high-risk prostate cancer with high sensitivity. However, multiparametric MRI seems to have advantages in tumor volume assessment and for the detection of prostate cancer in the transitional zone and anterior part within prostates larger than 40 cm3.
本研究旨在比较实时弹性成像(RTE)与多参数 MRI 检测前列腺癌的检出率,以评估两种方法的优缺点。
39 例经活检证实的前列腺癌患者在根治性前列腺切除术前均行 RTE 和多参数 MRI 以定位前列腺癌。RTE 用于评估前列腺组织弹性,硬病灶被认为可疑前列腺癌。多参数 MRI 包括 T2 加权 MRI、扩散加权 MRI(DWI)和对比增强 MRI(CE-MRI),采用 1.5 T 直肠内线圈。根治性前列腺切除术后,生成前列腺全距切片,分析两种方法检测体积为 0.2 cm3 或以上的癌灶的检出率。
组织病理学检查发现 61 个癌灶。RTE 在外周带描绘了 50 个癌灶中的 39 个(78.0%),在移行带描绘了 11 个中的 2 个(18.2%)。多参数 MRI 在外周带描绘了 50 个癌灶中的 45 个(90.0%),在移行带描绘了 11 个中的 8 个(72.7%)。在前列腺体积大于 40 cm3 的情况下,两种方法在移行带和前区之间存在显著差异(p<0.05)。两种方法对高危前列腺癌(Gleason 评分≥4 和 3 分)和体积大于 0.5 cm3 的癌灶的检出率均较高(RTE 为 93.8%和 80.5%,多参数 MRI 为 87.5%和 92.7%)。与 RTE 相比,T2 加权 MRI 对前列腺癌体积的测量更可靠(Spearman 秩相关系数,0.72 和 0.46)。
RTE 和多参数 MRI 对高危前列腺癌具有较高的敏感性。然而,多参数 MRI 在肿瘤体积评估以及检测前列腺体积大于 40 cm3 的移行带和前区前列腺癌方面似乎具有优势。