Gandhi Shivani V, Rodriguez William, Khan Mansoor, Polli James E
University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, Maryland, 21201, USA.
AAPS PharmSciTech. 2014 Jun;15(3):601-11. doi: 10.1208/s12249-014-0084-0. Epub 2014 Feb 21.
It has been advocated that biopharmaceutic risk assessment should be conducted early in pediatric product development and synchronized with the adult product development program. However, we are unaware of efforts to classify drugs into a Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS) framework for pediatric patients. The objective was to classify five drugs into a potential BCS. These five drugs were selected since both oral and intravenous pharmacokinetic data were available for each drug, and covered the four BCS classes in adults. Literature searches for each drug were conducted using Medline and applied to classify drugs with respect to solubility and permeability in pediatric subpopulations. Four pediatric subpopulations were considered: neonates, infants, children, and adolescents. Regarding solubility, dose numbers were calculated using a volume for each subpopulation based on body surface area (BSA) relative to 250 ml for a 1.73 m(2) adult. Dose numbers spanned a range of values, depending upon the pediatric dose formula and subpopulation. Regarding permeability, pharmacokinetic literature data required assumptions and decisions about data collection. Using a devised pediatric BCS framework, there was agreement in adult and pediatric BCS class for two drugs, azithromycin (class 3) and ciprofloxacin (class 4). There was discordance for the three drugs that have high adult permeability since all pediatric permeabilities were low: dolasetron (class 3 in pediatric), ketoprofen (class 4 in pediatric), and voriconazole (class 4 in pediatric). A main contribution of this work is the identification of critical factors required for a pediatric BCS.
有人主张,生物制药风险评估应在儿科产品研发早期进行,并与成人产品研发计划同步。然而,我们并不知晓有将药物分类到儿科患者生物药剂学分类系统(BCS)框架中的相关工作。目的是将五种药物分类到潜在的BCS中。选择这五种药物是因为每种药物都有口服和静脉给药的药代动力学数据,且涵盖了成人的四个BCS类别。使用Medline对每种药物进行文献检索,并应用于对儿科亚组中药物的溶解度和渗透性进行分类。考虑了四个儿科亚组:新生儿、婴儿、儿童和青少年。关于溶解度,根据相对于1.73 m²成人250 ml的体表面积(BSA),为每个亚组计算剂量数。剂量数因儿科剂量公式和亚组而异。关于渗透性,药代动力学文献数据需要对数据收集进行假设和决策。使用设计的儿科BCS框架,阿奇霉素(3类)和环丙沙星(4类)这两种药物在成人和儿科BCS类别上达成一致。对于三种成人渗透性高但儿科渗透性低的药物存在不一致:多潘立酮(儿科3类)、酮洛芬(儿科4类)和伏立康唑(儿科4类)。这项工作的一个主要贡献是确定了儿科BCS所需的关键因素。