• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Vitamin D: an examination of physician and patient management of health and uncertainty.维生素D:医生与患者对健康及不确定性的管理审视
Qual Health Res. 2014 Mar;24(3):375-86. doi: 10.1177/1049732314523681. Epub 2014 Feb 20.
2
Provider Recommendations in the Face of Scientific Uncertainty: An Analysis of Audio-Recorded Discussions about Vitamin D.面对科学不确定性时的提供者建议:关于维生素D的录音讨论分析
J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Aug;31(8):909-17. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3667-5. Epub 2016 Mar 23.
3
How Patients View Lung Cancer Screening. The Role of Uncertainty in Medical Decision Making.患者如何看待肺癌筛查。医学决策不确定性的作用。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016 Nov;13(11):1969-1976. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201604-290OC.
4
Decision-making under clinical uncertainty: An in-depth examination of provider perspectives on adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II colon cancer.临床不确定性下的决策:对 II 期结肠癌辅助化疗中提供者观点的深入考察。
Patient Educ Couns. 2019 Feb;102(2):284-290. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.09.015. Epub 2018 Sep 17.
5
Family members' perceptions of inpatient palliative care consult services: a qualitative study.家庭成员对住院姑息治疗咨询服务的看法:一项定性研究。
Palliat Med. 2014 Jan;28(1):42-8. doi: 10.1177/0269216313491620. Epub 2013 Jun 6.
6
"We are the ones who should make the decision" - knowledge and understanding of the rights-based approach to maternity care among women and healthcare providers.“我们才是应该做决定的人”——产妇和医疗保健提供者对基于权利的产科护理方法的知识和理解。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Feb 15;19(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2189-7.
7
Providers' perceptions of barriers to the management of type 2 diabetes in remote Aboriginal settings.医疗服务提供者对偏远原住民地区2型糖尿病管理障碍的看法。
Int J Circumpolar Health. 2011;70(5):552-63. doi: 10.3402/ijch.v70i5.17848. Epub 2011 Nov 1.
8
A qualitative study of adult AAC users' experiences communicating with medical providers.一项关于成年辅助沟通系统用户与医疗服务提供者交流经历的定性研究。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2013 Nov;8(6):472-81. doi: 10.3109/17483107.2012.746398. Epub 2013 Jan 28.
9
Speaking of risk, managing uncertainty: decision-making about cholesterol-reducing treatment in general practice.说到风险,应对不确定性:全科医疗中降低胆固醇治疗的决策
Qual Prim Care. 2012;20(4):245-52.
10
Factors for Supporting Primary Care Physician Engagement With Patient Apps for Type 2 Diabetes Self-Management That Link to Primary Care: Interview Study.支持初级保健医生参与与初级保健相关的 2 型糖尿病自我管理患者应用程序的因素:访谈研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Jan 16;7(1):e11885. doi: 10.2196/11885.

引用本文的文献

1
Vitamin D and Albumin Deficiency in a Swiss Orthopaedic Surgery In-Patient Cohort.瑞士骨科手术住院患者队列中的维生素D和白蛋白缺乏情况
J Clin Med. 2024 Apr 27;13(9):2577. doi: 10.3390/jcm13092577.
2
Reducing unnecessary vitamin testing in general practice: barriers and facilitators according to general practitioners and patients.减少一般实践中不必要的维生素检测:根据全科医生和患者的观点来看的障碍和促进因素。
BMJ Open. 2019 Oct 7;9(10):e029760. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029760.
3
Older Adults' Beliefs, Knowledge and Preferences for Achieving Healthy Vitamin D Status: A Narrative Review.老年人对实现健康维生素D水平的信念、知识和偏好:一项叙述性综述
Geriatrics (Basel). 2018 May 30;3(2):26. doi: 10.3390/geriatrics3020026.
4
Importance of n-3 PUFA consumption during pregnancy: perception discrepancies between pregnant women and gynaecologists-obstetricians in Belgium.孕期摄入 n-3PUFA 的重要性:比利时孕妇和妇产科医生之间的认知差异。
Public Health Nutr. 2019 May;22(7):1259-1268. doi: 10.1017/S1368980019000089. Epub 2019 Feb 20.
5
Clinical Management of Low Vitamin D: A Scoping Review of Physicians' Practices.临床维生素 D 缺乏症管理:对医师实践的范围性回顾。
Nutrients. 2018 Apr 16;10(4):493. doi: 10.3390/nu10040493.
6
What Do People Know and Believe about Vitamin D?人们对维生素D了解和相信些什么?
Nutrients. 2016 Nov 11;8(11):718. doi: 10.3390/nu8110718.
7
Representations of the health value of vitamin D supplementation in newspapers: media content analysis.报纸中维生素 D 补充剂健康价值的表述:媒体内容分析。
BMJ Open. 2014 Dec 31;4(12):e006395. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006395.

本文引用的文献

1
Decision making in pediatric oncology: evaluation and incorporation of patient and parent preferences.儿科肿瘤学决策:患者和家长偏好的评估和纳入。
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2013 Apr;60(4):558-63. doi: 10.1002/pbc.24450. Epub 2012 Dec 31.
2
IOM committee members respond to Endocrine Society vitamin D guideline.IOM 委员会成员回应内分泌学会维生素 D 指南。
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012 Apr;97(4):1146-52. doi: 10.1210/jc.2011-2218. Epub 2012 Mar 22.
3
Guidelines for preventing and treating vitamin D deficiency and insufficiency revisited.重新审视维生素D缺乏和不足的防治指南。
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012 Apr;97(4):1153-8. doi: 10.1210/jc.2011-2601. Epub 2012 Mar 22.
4
Vitamin D with or without calcium supplementation for prevention of cancer and fractures: an updated meta-analysis for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.维生素 D 联合或不联合钙补充剂用于预防癌症和骨折:美国预防服务工作组的更新荟萃分析。
Ann Intern Med. 2011 Dec 20;155(12):827-38. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-12-201112200-00005.
5
Long-term follow-up for mortality and cancer in a randomized placebo-controlled trial of vitamin D(3) and/or calcium (RECORD trial).维生素 D(3) 和/或钙的随机安慰剂对照试验(RECORD 试验)的死亡率和癌症长期随访结果。
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012 Feb;97(2):614-22. doi: 10.1210/jc.2011-1309. Epub 2011 Nov 23.
6
Effect of a physician uncertainty reduction intervention on blood pressure in uncontrolled hypertensives--a cluster randomized trial.医生减少不确定性干预对未控制高血压患者血压的影响——一项集群随机试验。
J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Apr;27(4):413-9. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1888-1. Epub 2011 Oct 27.
7
Effects of three-monthly oral 150,000 IU cholecalciferol supplementation on falls, mobility, and muscle strength in older postmenopausal women: a randomized controlled trial.口服 150,000IU 胆钙化醇每三月一次补充剂对老年绝经后妇女跌倒、活动能力和肌肉力量的影响:一项随机对照试验。
J Bone Miner Res. 2012 Jan;27(1):170-6. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.524.
8
Uncertainty in medicine: meanings of menopause and hormone replacement therapy in medical textbooks.医学中的不确定性:医学教材中绝经和激素替代疗法的含义。
Soc Sci Med. 2011 Oct;73(8):1238-45. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.07.024. Epub 2011 Aug 26.
9
Vitamin D and type 2 diabetes: a systematic review.维生素 D 与 2 型糖尿病:系统综述。
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2011 Sep;65(9):1005-15. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2011.118. Epub 2011 Jul 6.
10
Vitamin D and prevention of cardiovascular disease and diabetes: why the evidence falls short.维生素D与心血管疾病及糖尿病的预防:为何证据不足。
JAMA. 2011 Jun 22;305(24):2565-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.881.

维生素D:医生与患者对健康及不确定性的管理审视

Vitamin D: an examination of physician and patient management of health and uncertainty.

作者信息

Bennett Keisa, Frisby Brandi N, Young Laura E, Murray Deborah

机构信息

1University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.

出版信息

Qual Health Res. 2014 Mar;24(3):375-86. doi: 10.1177/1049732314523681. Epub 2014 Feb 20.

DOI:10.1177/1049732314523681
PMID:24558016
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3951658/
Abstract

Vitamin D has been a topic of much research interest and controversy, and evidence is mixed concerning its preventive effects and health benefits. The purpose of our study was to explore the decision-making strategies used by both primary care providers and community members surrounding vitamin D in relation to uncertainty management theory. We conducted semistructured interviews with primary care providers (n = 7) and focus groups with community members (n = 89), and transcribed and coded using the constant comparative method. Themes for providers included awareness, uncertainty, patient role, responsibility, skepticism, uncertainty management, and evolving perceptions. Community member focus group themes included uncertainty, information sources, awareness/knowledge, barriers, and patient-provider relationship. Both providers and community members expressed uncertainty about vitamin D but used conflicting strategies to manage uncertainty. Awareness of this disconnect might facilitate improved patient-provider communication.

摘要

维生素D一直是众多研究兴趣和争议的主题,关于其预防作用和健康益处的证据好坏参半。我们研究的目的是围绕不确定性管理理论,探讨初级保健提供者和社区成员在维生素D问题上所采用的决策策略。我们对初级保健提供者(n = 7)进行了半结构化访谈,并对社区成员(n = 89)进行了焦点小组访谈,然后使用持续比较法进行转录和编码。提供者的主题包括意识、不确定性、患者角色、责任、怀疑态度、不确定性管理以及不断变化的认知。社区成员焦点小组的主题包括不确定性、信息来源、意识/知识、障碍以及患者与提供者的关系。提供者和社区成员都表达了对维生素D的不确定性,但采用了相互矛盾的策略来管理不确定性。意识到这种脱节可能有助于改善患者与提供者之间的沟通。