• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

冠状动脉内注射与静脉注射腺苷诱导的最大冠状动脉充血用于血流储备分数测量。

Intracoronary versus intravenous adenosine-induced maximal coronary hyperemia for fractional flow reserve measurements.

作者信息

Khashaba Ahmed, Mortada Ayman, Omran Azza

机构信息

Ain Shams University, Cardiology Department Cairo, Egypt.

出版信息

Clin Med Insights Cardiol. 2014 Feb 12;8:17-21. doi: 10.4137/CMC.S11535. eCollection 2014.

DOI:10.4137/CMC.S11535
PMID:24558302
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3928055/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Maximal hyperemia is the critical prerequisite for fractional flow reserve (FFR) assessment. Despite intravenous (IV) adenosine currently being the recommended approach, intracoronary (IC) administration of adenosine constitutes a valuable alternative in everyday practice. However, it is surprisingly unclear which IC strategy allows the achievement of FFR values that are comparable to IV adenosine.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to compare increasing doses of IC adenosine versus IV adenosine for FFR.

METHODS

30 intermediate coronary stenoses undergoing FFR measurement were prospectively and consecutively enrolled. Hyperemia was sequentially induced by bolus of IC adenosine (ADN; 150 μg) followed by IV adenosine (IVADN) infusion over 3 minutes at dose of (140 μg/kg/min). FFR values, symptoms, and development of atrioventricular block were recorded.

RESULTS

150 μg doses of IC adenosine were well tolerated and associated with fewer symptoms than IV adenosine. Intracoronary adenosine doses induced a significant decrease of FFR compared with baseline levels (P < 0.01). Among the 6 patients with FFR values less than 0.80 identified by IVADN, 4 were correctly identified also by 150 μg bolus IC adenosine. Larger randomized studies with cross-over design are necessary to verify the results.

CONCLUSIONS

This small pilot study suggests that IC adenosine might be an alternative to IV adenosine. Larger randomized studies with a cross-over design are necessary.

摘要

背景

最大充血是血流储备分数(FFR)评估的关键前提条件。尽管目前推荐静脉注射腺苷,但在日常实践中,冠状动脉内注射腺苷也是一种有价值的替代方法。然而,令人惊讶的是,目前尚不清楚哪种冠状动脉内注射策略能够获得与静脉注射腺苷相当的FFR值。

目的

本研究旨在比较递增剂量的冠状动脉内注射腺苷与静脉注射腺苷用于FFR测定的效果。

方法

前瞻性连续纳入30例接受FFR测量的中度冠状动脉狭窄患者。先通过冠状动脉内注射腺苷(ADN;150μg)推注诱导充血,随后在3分钟内以(140μg/kg/min)的剂量静脉输注腺苷(IVADN)。记录FFR值、症状及房室传导阻滞的发生情况。

结果

150μg剂量的冠状动脉内注射腺苷耐受性良好,且与静脉注射腺苷相比症状更少。冠状动脉内注射腺苷剂量与基线水平相比,FFR显著降低(P<0.01)。在静脉注射腺苷确定的6例FFR值小于0.80的患者中,4例也被150μg推注的冠状动脉内注射腺苷正确识别。需要更大规模的交叉设计随机研究来验证结果。

结论

这项小型初步研究表明,冠状动脉内注射腺苷可能是静脉注射腺苷的一种替代方法。需要更大规模的交叉设计随机研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a79b/3928055/ba52bc2d6318/cmc-8-2014-017f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a79b/3928055/ba52bc2d6318/cmc-8-2014-017f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a79b/3928055/ba52bc2d6318/cmc-8-2014-017f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Intracoronary versus intravenous adenosine-induced maximal coronary hyperemia for fractional flow reserve measurements.冠状动脉内注射与静脉注射腺苷诱导的最大冠状动脉充血用于血流储备分数测量。
Clin Med Insights Cardiol. 2014 Feb 12;8:17-21. doi: 10.4137/CMC.S11535. eCollection 2014.
2
Maximal hyperemia in the assessment of fractional flow reserve: intracoronary adenosine versus intracoronary sodium nitroprusside versus intravenous adenosine: the NASCI (Nitroprussiato versus Adenosina nelle Stenosi Coronariche Intermedie) study.评估血流储备分数时的最大充血:冠状动脉内腺苷与冠状动脉内硝普钠与静脉内腺苷:NASCI(中间冠状动脉狭窄中的硝普钠与腺苷)研究。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Apr;5(4):402-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2011.12.014.
3
Comparison of intracoronary versus intravenous adenosine-induced maximal hyperemia for fractional flow reserve measurement: A systematic review and meta-analysis.冠状动脉内与静脉内腺苷诱导最大充血在血流储备分数测量中的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Nov 1;94(5):714-721. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28317. Epub 2019 May 9.
4
Adequacy of intracoronary versus intravenous adenosine-induced maximal coronary hyperemia for fractional flow reserve measurements.冠状动脉内注射与静脉注射腺苷诱导最大冠状动脉充血用于测量血流储备分数的充分性。
Am Heart J. 2000 Oct;140(4):651-7. doi: 10.1067/mhj.2000.109920.
5
Are high doses of intracoronary adenosine an alternative to standard intravenous adenosine for the assessment of fractional flow reserve?高剂量冠状动脉内注射腺苷能否替代标准静脉注射腺苷用于评估血流储备分数?
Am Heart J. 2004 Oct;148(4):590-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2004.04.008.
6
Impact of increasing dose of intracoronary adenosine on peak hyperemia duration during fractional flow reserve assessment.在血流储备分数评估中,增加冠状动脉内腺苷剂量对峰值充血持续时间的影响。
Int J Cardiol. 2019 Jun 1;284:16-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.09.088. Epub 2018 Oct 2.
7
Comparison of efficacy and safety of intracoronary nicardipine and adenosine for fractional flow reserve assessment of coronary stenosis.冠状动脉内尼卡地平与腺苷评估冠状动脉狭窄血流储备分数的疗效和安全性比较。
Int J Cardiol. 2022 Jun 1;356:1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2022.04.008. Epub 2022 Apr 6.
8
Comparison of the intracoronary continuous infusion method using a microcatheter and the intravenous continuous adenosine infusion method for inducing maximal hyperemia for fractional flow reserve measurement.使用微导管的冠状动脉内持续输注法与静脉持续输注腺苷法在诱导最大充血以测量血流储备分数方面的比较。
Am Heart J. 2009 Jun;157(6):1050-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2009.03.012.
9
Adenosine intracoronary bolus dose escalation versus intravenous infusion to induce maximum coronary hyperemia for fractional flow reserve assessment.冠状动脉内腺苷推注剂量递增与静脉输注诱导最大冠状动脉充血以评估血流储备分数。
Kardiol Pol. 2019 Jun 25;77(6):610-617. doi: 10.5603/KP.a2019.0060. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
10
Comparison of intracoronary versus intravenous administration of adenosine for measurement of coronary fractional flow reserve.冠状动脉内注射与静脉注射腺苷用于测量冠状动脉血流储备分数的比较。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 May;8(5). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.001781.

引用本文的文献

1
Simplifying the assessment of coronary artery stenosis by enhancing instantaneous wave free ratio.通过提高瞬时无波比值简化冠状动脉狭窄的评估。
Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2018 Apr;8(2):156-163. doi: 10.21037/cdt.2017.12.04.
2
The Impact of Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Coronary Revascularization in Patients with Coronary Stenoses of Intermediate Severity.血流储备分数指导下的冠状动脉血运重建对中度冠状动脉狭窄患者的影响。
Acta Cardiol Sin. 2017 Jul;33(4):353-361. doi: 10.6515/acs20170202b.
3
Assessment of increasing intravenous adenosine dose in fractional flow reserve.

本文引用的文献

1
Maximal hyperemia in the assessment of fractional flow reserve: intracoronary adenosine versus intracoronary sodium nitroprusside versus intravenous adenosine: the NASCI (Nitroprussiato versus Adenosina nelle Stenosi Coronariche Intermedie) study.评估血流储备分数时的最大充血:冠状动脉内腺苷与冠状动脉内硝普钠与静脉内腺苷:NASCI(中间冠状动脉狭窄中的硝普钠与腺苷)研究。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Apr;5(4):402-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2011.12.014.
2
Effects of increasing doses of intracoronary adenosine on the assessment of fractional flow reserve.腺苷冠状动脉内给药剂量增加对血流储备分数评估的影响。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Oct;4(10):1079-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2011.08.004.
3
在血流储备分数中增加静脉注射腺苷剂量的评估
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2017 Feb 14;17(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s12872-016-0463-4.
Myocardial no-reflow in humans.
人类心肌无复流现象
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Jul 21;54(4):281-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.03.054.
4
Comparison of the intracoronary continuous infusion method using a microcatheter and the intravenous continuous adenosine infusion method for inducing maximal hyperemia for fractional flow reserve measurement.使用微导管的冠状动脉内持续输注法与静脉持续输注腺苷法在诱导最大充血以测量血流储备分数方面的比较。
Am Heart J. 2009 Jun;157(6):1050-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2009.03.012.
5
Randomized evaluation of intracoronary nitroprusside vs. adenosine after thrombus aspiration during primary percutaneous coronary intervention for the prevention of no-reflow in acute myocardial infarction: the REOPEN-AMI study protocol.急性心肌梗死直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中血栓抽吸术后冠状动脉内硝普钠与腺苷预防无复流的随机评估:REOPEN-AMI研究方案
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2009 Jul;10(7):585-92. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0b013e32832b3571.
6
Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention.血流储备分数与血管造影术在指导经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的比较
N Engl J Med. 2009 Jan 15;360(3):213-24. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0807611.
7
Fractional flow reserve: a review: invasive imaging.血流储备分数:综述:侵入性成像
Heart. 2008 Jul;94(7):949-59. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2007.122838.
8
Pharmacological options for inducing maximal hyperaemia during studies of coronary physiology.在冠状动脉生理学研究中诱导最大充血的药理学选择。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Feb 1;71(2):198-204. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21307.
9
Percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally nonsignificant stenosis: 5-year follow-up of the DEFER Study.功能性无显著意义狭窄的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:DEFER研究的5年随访
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 May 29;49(21):2105-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.01.087. Epub 2007 May 17.
10
[Safety and effectiveness of pharmacologic versus mechanical stabilization of borderline coronary lesions in patients with acute coronary syndromes].[急性冠状动脉综合征患者边缘性冠状动脉病变药物与机械稳定治疗的安全性和有效性]
Przegl Lek. 2005;62(1):1-7.