Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10022, USA.
Implement Sci. 2014 Feb 21;9:25. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-9-25.
Although dental care settings provide an exceptional opportunity to reach smokers and provide brief cessation advice and treatment to reduce oral and other tobacco-related health conditions, dental care providers demonstrate limited adherence to evidence-based guidelines for treatment of tobacco use and dependence.
METHODS/DESIGN: Guided by a multi-level, conceptual framework that emphasizes changes in provider beliefs and organizational characteristics as drivers of improvement in tobacco treatment delivery, the current protocol will use a cluster, randomized design and multiple data sources (patient exit interviews, provider surveys, site observations, chart audits, and semi-structured provider interviews) to study the process of implementing clinical practice guidelines for treating tobacco dependence in 18 public dental care clinics in New York City. The specific aims of this comparative-effectiveness research trial are to: compare the effectiveness of three promising strategies for implementation of tobacco use treatment guidelines-staff training and current best practices (CBP), CBP + provider performance feedback (PF), and CBP + PF + provider reimbursement for delivery of tobacco cessation treatment (pay-for-performance, or P4P); examine potential theory-driven mechanisms hypothesized to explain the comparative effectiveness of three strategies for implementation; and identify baseline organizational factors that influence the implementation of evidence-based tobacco use treatment practices in dental clinics. The primary outcome is change in providers' tobacco treatment practices and the secondary outcomes are cost per quit, use of tobacco cessation treatments, quit attempts, and smoking abstinence.
We hypothesize that the value of these promising implementation strategies is additive and that incorporating all three strategies (CBP, PF, and P4P) will be superior to CBP alone and CBP + PF in improving delivery of cessation assistance to smokers. The findings will improve knowledge pertinent to the implementation, dissemination, and sustained utilization of evidence-based tobacco use treatment in dental practices.
NCT01615237.
尽管牙科保健环境为接触吸烟者并提供简短的戒烟建议和治疗提供了极好的机会,以减少口腔和其他与烟草相关的健康问题,但牙科保健提供者在遵循治疗烟草使用和依赖的循证指南方面表现出有限的依从性。
方法/设计:本研究以一个多层面的概念框架为指导,该框架强调提供者信念和组织特征的变化是改善烟草治疗提供的驱动力,目前的方案将使用集群、随机设计和多个数据源(患者退出访谈、提供者调查、现场观察、图表审计和半结构化提供者访谈)来研究在纽约市 18 家公共牙科保健诊所实施治疗烟草依赖的临床实践指南的过程。这项比较有效性研究试验的具体目标是:比较三种有前途的实施烟草使用治疗指南的策略的有效性-员工培训和当前最佳实践(CBP)、CBP+提供者绩效反馈(PF)和 CBP+PF+提供者提供戒烟治疗的报酬(按绩效付费,或 P4P);检验假设为解释三种实施策略的比较有效性的潜在理论驱动机制;并确定影响牙科诊所实施基于证据的烟草使用治疗实践的基线组织因素。主要结果是提供者烟草治疗实践的变化,次要结果是每戒烟成本、使用烟草戒烟治疗、戒烟尝试和吸烟戒断。
我们假设这些有前途的实施策略的价值是累加的,并且整合所有三种策略(CBP、PF 和 P4P)将优于 CBP 单独和 CBP+PF 提高向吸烟者提供戒烟帮助的效果。研究结果将提高与在牙科实践中实施、传播和持续利用基于证据的烟草使用治疗相关的知识。
NCT01615237。