Ludikhuize Jeroen, Borgert Marjon, Binnekade Jan, Subbe Christian, Dongelmans Dave, Goossens Astrid
Department of Anaesthesiology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Quality Assurance and Process Innovation, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Quality Assurance and Process Innovation, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Resuscitation. 2014 May;85(5):676-82. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.02.009. Epub 2014 Feb 20.
To study the effect of protocolized measurement (three times daily) of the Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS) versus measurement on indication on the degree of implementation of the Rapid Response System (RRS).
A quasi-experimental study was conducted in a University Hospital in Amsterdam between September and November 2011. Patients who were admitted for at least one overnight stay were included. Wards were randomized to measure the MEWS three times daily ("protocolized") versus measuring the MEWS "when clinically indicated" in the control group. At the end of each month, for an entire seven-day week, all vital signs recorded for patients were registered. The outcomes were categorized into process measures including the degree of implementation and compliance to set monitoring standards and secondly, outcomes such as the degree of delay in physician notification and Rapid Response Team (RRT) activation in patients with raised MEWS (MEWS≥3).
MEWS calculations from vital signs occurred in 70% (2513/3585) on the protocolized wards versus 2% (65/3013) in the control group. Compliance with the protocolized regime was presents in 68% (819/1205), compliance in the control group was present in 4% (47/1232) of the measurements. There were 90 calls to primary physicians on the protocolized and 9 calls on the control wards. Additionally on protocolized wards, there were twice as much RRT calls per admission.
Vital signs and MEWS determination three times daily, results in better detection of physiological abnormalities and more reliable activations of the RRT.
研究改良早期预警评分(MEWS)按方案进行测量(每日三次)与按需测量对快速反应系统(RRS)实施程度的影响。
2011年9月至11月在阿姆斯特丹的一家大学医院进行了一项准实验研究。纳入至少住院过夜一次的患者。各病房被随机分为每日三次测量MEWS(“按方案进行”)组和对照组,对照组在临床指征出现时测量MEWS。在每个月的最后一周,对记录的所有患者生命体征进行登记。结果分为过程指标,包括实施程度和对设定监测标准的依从性,其次是结果指标,如MEWS升高(MEWS≥3)患者中医生通知延迟程度和快速反应小组(RRT)启动情况。
在按方案进行测量的病房中,70%(2513/3585)的生命体征进行了MEWS计算,而对照组为2%(65/3013)。按方案进行测量的依从率为68%(819/1205),对照组测量的依从率为4%(47/1232)。按方案进行测量的病房向初级医生呼叫90次,对照组病房呼叫9次。此外,在按方案进行测量的病房,每次入院时RRT呼叫次数是对照组的两倍。
每日三次测量生命体征和MEWS,能更好地检测生理异常情况,更可靠地启动RRT。