• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

语义分类中的相关性比例效应:重新审视自动扩散激活过程。

Relatedness proportion effects in semantic categorization: reconsidering the automatic spreading activation process.

作者信息

de Wit Bianca, Kinoshita Sachiko

机构信息

ARC Centre of Excellence in Cognition and Its Disorders, Macquarie University.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2014 Nov;40(6):1733-44. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000004. Epub 2014 Feb 24.

DOI:10.1037/xlm0000004
PMID:24564544
Abstract

Semantic priming effects at a short prime-target stimulus onset asynchrony are commonly explained in terms of an automatic spreading activation process. According to this view, the proportion of related trials should have no impact on the size of the semantic priming effect. Using a semantic categorization task ("Is this a living thing?"), we show that on the contrary, there is a robust effect of relatedness proportion on the size of the semantic priming effect. This effect is not due to the participants using the prime to predict the target category/response, as manipulating the proportion of category/response-congruent trials produces a very different pattern. Taken together with response time distribution analysis, we argue that the semantic priming effect observed here is best explained in terms of an evidence accumulation process and source confusion between the prime and target.

摘要

在短启动刺激-目标刺激呈现间隔下的语义启动效应通常用自动扩散激活过程来解释。根据这一观点,相关试验的比例对语义启动效应的大小不应有影响。我们使用一个语义分类任务(“这是一个生物吗?”)表明,相反,相关性比例对语义启动效应的大小有显著影响。这种效应并非由于参与者利用启动刺激来预测目标类别/反应,因为操纵类别/反应一致试验的比例会产生非常不同的模式。结合反应时间分布分析,我们认为这里观察到的语义启动效应最好用证据积累过程以及启动刺激和目标刺激之间的来源混淆来解释。

相似文献

1
Relatedness proportion effects in semantic categorization: reconsidering the automatic spreading activation process.语义分类中的相关性比例效应:重新审视自动扩散激活过程。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2014 Nov;40(6):1733-44. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000004. Epub 2014 Feb 24.
2
The masked semantic priming effect is task dependent: Reconsidering the automatic spreading activation process.掩蔽语义启动效应取决于任务:重新审视自动扩散激活过程。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2015 Jul;41(4):1062-75. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000074. Epub 2014 Dec 8.
3
An RT distribution analysis of relatedness proportion effects in lexical decision and semantic categorization reveals different mechanisms.在词汇判断和语义分类中对相关性比例效应进行的反应时分布分析揭示了不同的机制。
Mem Cognit. 2015 Jan;43(1):99-110. doi: 10.3758/s13421-014-0446-6.
4
With great expectations, can two "wrongs" prime a "right"?怀着极大的期望,两个“错误”能引发一个“正确”吗?
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2001 Nov;27(6):1451-63.
5
Unconscious congruency priming from unpracticed words is modulated by prime-target semantic relatedness.无意识一致性启动不受练习词的影响,而是受启动词-目标词语义相关性的调节。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013 Mar;39(2):394-413. doi: 10.1037/a0028876. Epub 2012 Jun 11.
6
Electrophysiology reveals semantic priming at a short SOA irrespective of depth of prime processing.电生理学研究表明,无论启动刺激加工的深度如何,在短刺激呈现间隔下都会出现语义启动效应。
Neurosci Lett. 2009 Apr 3;453(2):107-11. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2009.02.013. Epub 2009 Feb 10.
7
Explicit semantic tasks are necessary to study semantic priming effects with high rates of repetition.明确的语义任务对于研究具有高重复率的语义启动效应是必要的。
Clin Neurophysiol. 2012 Apr;123(4):741-54. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2011.08.025. Epub 2011 Sep 29.
8
Category size effects revisited: frequency and masked priming effects in semantic categorization.再探类别大小效应:语义分类中的频率与掩蔽启动效应
Brain Lang. 2004 Jul-Sep;90(1-3):276-86. doi: 10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00440-1.
9
Beyond spreading activation: an influence of relatedness proportion on masked semantic priming.超越扩散激活:关联比例对掩蔽语义启动的影响。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2003 Sep;10(3):645-52. doi: 10.3758/bf03196527.
10
Automatic semantic activation is no myth: semantic context effects on the N400 in the letter-search task in the absence of response time effects.自动语义激活并非虚构:在无反应时间效应的字母搜索任务中,语义语境对N400的影响。
Psychol Sci. 2004 Dec;15(12):852-7. doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00766.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding words in context: A naturalistic EEG study of children's lexical processing.语境中理解单词:一项关于儿童词汇加工的自然主义脑电图研究。
J Mem Lang. 2024 Aug;137. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2024.104512. Epub 2024 Mar 8.
2
What masked priming effects with abbreviations can tell us about abstract letter identities.缩写形式的掩蔽启动效应能告诉我们关于抽象字母身份的哪些信息。
J Mem Lang. 2021 Apr;117. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2020.104209.
3
Evidence accumulation in the integrated and primed Stroop tasks.整合与启动斯特鲁普任务中的证据积累
Mem Cognit. 2017 Jul;45(5):824-836. doi: 10.3758/s13421-017-0701-8.
4
Delta plots with negative-going slopes as a potential marker of decreasing response activation in masked semantic priming.具有负斜率的增量图作为掩蔽语义启动中反应激活减少的潜在标志物。
Psychol Res. 2018 May;82(3):590-599. doi: 10.1007/s00426-017-0844-z. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
5
The onset and time course of semantic priming during rapid recognition of visual words.视觉单词快速识别过程中语义启动的起始与时间进程。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2017 May;43(5):881-902. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000377. Epub 2017 Feb 23.
6
The Egocentric Nature of Action-Sound Associations.动作-声音关联的自我中心本质。
Front Psychol. 2016 Feb 23;7:231. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00231. eCollection 2016.
7
An RT distribution analysis of relatedness proportion effects in lexical decision and semantic categorization reveals different mechanisms.在词汇判断和语义分类中对相关性比例效应进行的反应时分布分析揭示了不同的机制。
Mem Cognit. 2015 Jan;43(1):99-110. doi: 10.3758/s13421-014-0446-6.