Suppr超能文献

作战人员听觉态势感知:增强型听力保护/增强设备和 TCAPS 在军事地面作战应用中的效果。

Warfighter auditory situation awareness: effects of augmented hearing protection/enhancement devices and TCAPS for military ground combat applications.

机构信息

* U.S. Army Institute of Public Health , Aberdeen Proving Ground , USA.

出版信息

Int J Audiol. 2014 Mar;53 Suppl 2:S43-52. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2013.860489.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effects of current hearing protection/enhancement devices (HPEDs) and tactical communications and protection systems (TCAPS) on auditory detection and identification of three critical military signals associated with potential "threats."

DESIGN

Utilizing a 6 × 3 within-subject experimental design, 24 normal-hearing Virginia Tech Reserve Officer Training Corps (ROTC) cadets and active duty soldiers participated.

STUDY SAMPLE

Five HPEDS and TCAP devices plus the open ear were tested. On each trial, either wearing a device or with open ears, subjects walked along a 3000-foot line of discrete distance markers toward the auditory threat, which was not visible but still within line-of-sight over flat terrain, stopping to listen when instructed. On approach to the threat, the linear distance at first detection was measured, followed by a continued approach until positive identification occurred. Then the subject reversed direction, retreating away from the threat until detection was lost.

RESULTS

ANOVA and post hoc tests were applied to determine statistically-significant differences among HPEDs, TCAPS, and the open ear on the objective detection and identification distance measures.

CONCLUSIONS

The results have serious implications for selection of HPDs, HPEDs, and TCAPS for applications where preservation of auditory situational awareness via the fundamental detection and identification tasks are essential.

摘要

目的

确定当前听力保护/增强设备(HPED)和战术通信与保护系统(TCAPS)对与潜在“威胁”相关的三个关键军事信号的听觉检测和识别的影响。

设计

利用 6×3 被试内实验设计,24 名正常听力的弗吉尼亚理工预备役军官训练团(ROTC)学员和现役士兵参加了实验。

研究样本

测试了 5 种 HPED 和 TCAP 设备以及开放式耳朵。在每次试验中,受试者要么佩戴设备,要么使用开放式耳朵,沿着一条 3000 英尺长的离散距离标记线向听觉威胁方向行走,威胁虽然不可见,但仍在平坦地形的视距范围内,当被指示时停下来听。在接近威胁时,首先测量首次检测到的直线距离,然后继续接近,直到确认识别。然后,受试者反转方向,从威胁处后退,直到检测不到为止。

结果

应用方差分析和事后检验来确定 HPED、TCAPS 和开放式耳朵在客观检测和识别距离测量上的统计学显著差异。

结论

这些结果对 HPD、HPED 和 TCAPS 的选择具有严重影响,因为在需要通过基本检测和识别任务来保护听觉情境意识的应用中,这些结果至关重要。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验