Suppr超能文献

加拿大过敏症专家和非过敏症专家对肾上腺素使用和鸡蛋过敏者疫苗接种的看法。

Canadian allergists' and nonallergists' perception of epinephrine use and vaccination of persons with egg allergy.

机构信息

Division of Pediatric Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2013 May-Jun;1(3):289-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2013.03.006. Epub 2013 Apr 9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Studies suggest knowledge gaps about epinephrine use and vaccination of persons with egg allergy.

OBJECTIVE

We compared the perception of Canadian allergists and nonallergists on issues related to epinephrine use and vaccination of persons with egg allergy.

METHODS

Canadian allergists, pediatricians, general practitioners/family physicians and emergency room physicians were recruited through medical associations and surveyed on these issues. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to identify determinants of specific responses.

RESULTS

One-hundred fourteen allergists and 613 nonallergists participated. For most issues with accepted best practices, allergists were more likely to adhere to recommendations. Allergists versus nonallergists were more likely to recommend intramuscular epinephrine for anaphylaxis (odds ratio [OR] = 3.8; 95% CI, 1.43-10.11). Older physicians (OR = 0.98; 95% CI, 0.97-0.99), Canadian-Paediatric-Surveillance-Program participants (OR = 0.48; 95% CI, 0.24-0.96), family physicians (OR = 0.39; 95% CI, 0.16-0.96), and general practitioners (OR = 0.14; 95% CI, 0.04-0.52) were less likely to recommend intramuscular use. However, in severe anaphylaxis, >25% of both groups would not give epinephrine for patients presenting with breathing difficulties or hypotension. Use of epinephrine for severe anaphylaxis was less likely in older physicians (OR = 0.97; 95% CI, 0.95-0.99), female physicians (OR = 0.60; 95% CI, 0.39-0.89), and those practicing in Ontario (OR = 0.56; 95% CI, 0.36-0.86), Manitoba (OR = 0.42; 95% CI, 0.19-0.90), or Nova-Scotia (OR = 0.31; 95% CI, 0.12-0.78). Allergists (OR = 6.22; 95% CI, 3.60-10.72) and physicians treating mainly children (OR = 3.41; 95% CI, 1.87-6.25), or practicing in Quebec (OR = 1.68; 95% CI, 1.12-2.55) were more likely to recommend measles-mumps-rubella vaccination in a community facility.

CONCLUSION

Knowledge gaps about mode and indications for epinephrine administration and vaccination policies need to be addressed in future education programs to ensure prompt epinephrine use and to avoid unnecessary restriction of vaccines.

摘要

背景

研究表明,人们在肾上腺素使用和接种鸡蛋过敏疫苗方面存在知识差距。

目的

我们比较了加拿大过敏症专家和非过敏症专家对与鸡蛋过敏患者使用肾上腺素和接种疫苗相关问题的看法。

方法

通过医学协会招募加拿大过敏症专家、儿科医生、全科医生/家庭医生和急诊室医生,并就这些问题对他们进行调查。使用多变量逻辑回归模型来确定特定反应的决定因素。

结果

有 114 名过敏症专家和 613 名非过敏症专家参与了研究。对于大多数具有公认最佳实践的问题,过敏症专家更有可能遵循建议。与非过敏症专家相比,过敏症专家更有可能推荐肌肉内注射肾上腺素治疗过敏反应(比值比 [OR] = 3.8;95%置信区间,1.43-10.11)。年龄较大的医生(OR = 0.98;95%置信区间,0.97-0.99)、加拿大儿科监测计划参与者(OR = 0.48;95%置信区间,0.24-0.96)、家庭医生(OR = 0.39;95%置信区间,0.16-0.96)和全科医生(OR = 0.14;95%置信区间,0.04-0.52)不太可能推荐肌肉内使用。然而,在严重过敏反应中,两组中仍有超过 25%的人不会给有呼吸问题或低血压的患者注射肾上腺素。年龄较大的医生(OR = 0.97;95%置信区间,0.95-0.99)、女性医生(OR = 0.60;95%置信区间,0.39-0.89)和安大略省(OR = 0.56;95%置信区间,0.36-0.86)、马尼托巴省(OR = 0.42;95%置信区间,0.19-0.90)或新斯科舍省(OR = 0.31;95%置信区间,0.12-0.78)的医生更不可能使用肾上腺素治疗严重过敏反应。过敏症专家(OR = 6.22;95%置信区间,3.60-10.72)和主要治疗儿童的医生(OR = 3.41;95%置信区间,1.87-6.25)或在魁北克省(OR = 1.68;95%置信区间,1.12-2.55)工作的医生更有可能推荐在社区场所进行麻疹、腮腺炎和风疹疫苗接种。

结论

需要在未来的教育计划中解决肾上腺素给药方式和适应症以及疫苗接种政策方面的知识差距问题,以确保及时使用肾上腺素,并避免不必要地限制疫苗接种。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验