• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

头孢洛林酯用于治疗社区获得性细菌性肺炎相关菌血症的疗效

Efficacy of ceftaroline fosamil for bacteremia associated with community-acquired bacterial pneumonia.

作者信息

Jandourek Alena, Smith Alexander, Llorens Lily, Thye Dirk A, Eckburg Paul B, Friedland H David

机构信息

Director, Clinical Development; Cerexa, Inc., Oakland, CA.

出版信息

Hosp Pract (1995). 2014 Feb;42(1):75-8. doi: 10.3810/hp.2014.02.1094.

DOI:10.3810/hp.2014.02.1094
PMID:24566599
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Few publications of prospective studies have described patient outcomes in community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP)-associated bacteremia. Our objective, in performing this subgroup analysis, was to assess outcomes in subjects with CABP-associated bacteremia in 2 randomized, double-blind clinical studies comparing treatment with ceftaroline fosamil versus ceftriaxone.

METHODS

Our analysis summarizes baseline subject demographics, distribution of baseline pathogens isolated from blood cultures, clinical response rates at Day 4, and clinical cure rates at end of therapy and test of cure (8 to 15 days after end of therapy) in subjects with bacteremic CABP in the ceFtarOline Community-acquired pneUmonia trial vS ceftriaxone in hospitalized patients (FOCUS) studies.

RESULTS

In the FOCUS studies, 23 of 614 patients in the ceftaroline fosamil-treated group and 22 of 614 patients in the ceftriaxone-treated group had CABP-associated bacteremia. Baseline demographics were similar between groups. Streptococcus pneumoniae was the most common baseline bloodstream isolate. For subjects with CABP-associated bacteremia, clinical response/cure rates were similar at Day 4 (60.9% vs 59.1%), end of therapy (69.6% vs 72.7%), and test of cure (69.6% vs 68.2%) for ceftaroline fosamil and ceftriaxone, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In subjects with CABP-associated bacteremia, ceftaroline fosamil demonstrated similar clinical outcomes at Day 4, end of therapy, and test of cure compared with ceftriaxone.

摘要

目的

前瞻性研究中很少有出版物描述社区获得性细菌性肺炎(CABP)相关菌血症患者的预后情况。我们进行这项亚组分析的目的是在两项随机、双盲临床研究中评估CABP相关菌血症患者的预后,这两项研究比较了头孢洛林酯与头孢曲松的治疗效果。

方法

我们的分析总结了在头孢洛林社区获得性肺炎试验与住院患者头孢曲松对照研究(FOCUS)中,菌血症性CABP患者的基线受试者人口统计学数据、从血培养中分离出的基线病原体分布、第4天的临床反应率、治疗结束时的临床治愈率以及治愈测试(治疗结束后8至15天)情况。

结果

在FOCUS研究中,头孢洛林酯治疗组的614例患者中有23例、头孢曲松治疗组的614例患者中有22例发生了CABP相关菌血症。两组之间的基线人口统计学数据相似。肺炎链球菌是最常见的基线血流分离菌。对于CABP相关菌血症患者,头孢洛林酯和头孢曲松在第4天(分别为60.9%对59.1%)、治疗结束时(分别为69.6%对72.7%)和治愈测试时(分别为69.6%对68.2%)的临床反应/治愈率相似。

结论

在CABP相关菌血症患者中,与头孢曲松相比,头孢洛林酯在第4天、治疗结束时和治愈测试时显示出相似的临床结果。

相似文献

1
Efficacy of ceftaroline fosamil for bacteremia associated with community-acquired bacterial pneumonia.头孢洛林酯用于治疗社区获得性细菌性肺炎相关菌血症的疗效
Hosp Pract (1995). 2014 Feb;42(1):75-8. doi: 10.3810/hp.2014.02.1094.
2
Assessment of ceftaroline fosamil in the treatment of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia due to Streptococcus pneumoniae: insights from two randomized trials.评估头孢洛林酯治疗肺炎链球菌引起的社区获得性细菌性肺炎的疗效:来自两项随机试验的结果。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2013 Mar;75(3):298-303. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2012.12.002. Epub 2013 Jan 26.
3
FOCUS 1: a randomized, double-blinded, multicentre, Phase III trial of the efficacy and safety of ceftaroline fosamil versus ceftriaxone in community-acquired pneumonia.重点 1:头孢洛林酯氨噻肟与头孢曲松治疗社区获得性肺炎的疗效和安全性的随机、双盲、多中心、III 期临床试验。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011 Apr;66 Suppl 3:iii19-32. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkr096.
4
Summary of ceftaroline fosamil clinical trial studies and clinical safety.头孢洛林酯临床试验研究及临床安全性概述。
Clin Infect Dis. 2012 Sep;55 Suppl 3:S173-80. doi: 10.1093/cid/cis559.
5
FOCUS 2: a randomized, double-blinded, multicentre, Phase III trial of the efficacy and safety of ceftaroline fosamil versus ceftriaxone in community-acquired pneumonia.重点 2:头孢洛林酯氨噻肟与头孢曲松治疗社区获得性肺炎的疗效和安全性的随机、双盲、多中心 III 期临床试验。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011 Apr;66 Suppl 3:iii33-44. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkr097.
6
Ceftaroline fosamil in the treatment of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia and acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections.头孢洛林酯治疗社区获得性细菌性肺炎和急性细菌性皮肤和皮肤结构感染。
Drugs. 2012 Jul 30;72(11):1473-93. doi: 10.2165/11635660-000000000-00000.
7
A Randomized, Prospective Study of Pediatric Patients With Community-acquired Pneumonia Treated With Ceftaroline Versus Ceftriaxone.头孢洛林与头孢曲松治疗儿童社区获得性肺炎的随机前瞻性研究
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2016 Jul;35(7):752-9. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000001159.
8
Integrated safety summary of FOCUS 1 and FOCUS 2 trials: Phase III randomized, double-blind studies evaluating ceftaroline fosamil for the treatment of patients with community-acquired pneumonia.FOCUS 1 和 FOCUS 2 试验的综合安全性总结:III 期随机、双盲研究,评估头孢洛林酯治疗社区获得性肺炎患者。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011 Apr;66 Suppl 3:iii53-9. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkr099.
9
Integrated analysis of FOCUS 1 and FOCUS 2: randomized, doubled-blinded, multicenter phase 3 trials of the efficacy and safety of ceftaroline fosamil versus ceftriaxone in patients with community-acquired pneumonia.FOCUS 1 和 FOCUS 2 的综合分析:头孢洛林酯氨噻肟与头孢曲松治疗社区获得性肺炎的疗效和安全性的随机、双盲、多中心 3 期临床试验。
Clin Infect Dis. 2010 Dec 15;51(12):1395-405. doi: 10.1086/657313. Epub 2010 Nov 10.
10
Ceftaroline fosamil versus ceftriaxone for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia: individual patient data meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.头孢呋肟酯与头孢曲松治疗社区获得性肺炎的比较:随机对照试验的个体患者数据分析荟萃分析。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2016 Apr;71(4):862-70. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkv415. Epub 2015 Dec 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparing Several Treatments with Antibiotics for Community-Acquired Pneumonia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.比较几种治疗方法与抗生素治疗社区获得性肺炎的疗效:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Iran J Public Health. 2021 Jun;50(6):1108-1119. doi: 10.18502/ijph.v50i6.6410.
2
Plasma and Lung Tissue Pharmacokinetics of Ceftaroline Fosamil in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery with Cardiopulmonary Bypass: an Microdialysis Study.心脏手术体外循环患者中头孢洛林磷酸酯的血浆和肺组织药代动力学:一项微透析研究。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2021 Sep 17;65(10):e0067921. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00679-21. Epub 2021 Jul 19.
3
Efficacy and safety of ceftaroline: systematic review and meta-analysis.
头孢洛林的疗效与安全性:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Ther Adv Infect Dis. 2018 Nov 2;6:2049936118808655. doi: 10.1177/2049936118808655. eCollection 2019 Jan-Dec.
4
Efficacy and effectiveness of Ceftaroline Fosamil in patients with pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.头孢洛林酯治疗肺炎的疗效和有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Respir Res. 2018 Oct 23;19(1):205. doi: 10.1186/s12931-018-0905-x.