Suppr超能文献

猴子会选择去做选择吗?

Do monkeys choose to choose?

作者信息

Perdue Bonnie M, Evans Theodore A, Washburn David A, Rumbaugh Duane M, Beran Michael J

机构信息

Agnes Scott College, 141 E. College Avenue, Atlanta, Georgia, 30030,

出版信息

Learn Behav. 2014 Jun;42(2):164-75. doi: 10.3758/s13420-014-0135-0.

Abstract

Both empirical and anecdotal evidence supports the idea that choice is preferred by humans. Previous research has demonstrated that this preference extends to nonhuman animals, but it remains largely unknown whether animals will actively seek out or prefer opportunities to choose. Here we explored the issue of whether capuchin and rhesus monkeys choose to choose. We used a modified version of the SELECT task-a computer program in which monkeys can choose the order of completion of various psychomotor and cognitive tasks. In the present experiments, each trial began with a choice between two icons, one of which allowed the monkey to select the order of task completion, and the other of which led to the assignment of a task order by the computer. In either case, subjects still had to complete the same number of tasks and the same number of task trials. The tasks were relatively easy, and the monkeys responded correctly on most trials. Thus, global reinforcement rates were approximately equated across conditions. The only difference was whether the monkey chose the task order or it was assigned, thus isolating the act of choosing. Given sufficient experience with the task icons, all monkeys showed a significant preference for choice when the alternative was a randomly assigned order of tasks. To a lesser extent, some of the monkeys maintained a preference for choice over a preferred, but computer-assigned, task order that was yoked to their own previous choice selection. The results indicated that monkeys prefer to choose when all other aspects of the task are equated.

摘要

实证和轶事证据均支持人类偏爱选择这一观点。先前的研究表明,这种偏好也适用于非人类动物,但动物是否会主动寻求或偏爱选择机会在很大程度上仍不为人知。在此,我们探究了卷尾猴和恒河猴是否会选择去选择这一问题。我们使用了SELECT任务的一个修改版本——一个计算机程序,在该程序中猴子可以选择完成各种心理运动和认知任务的顺序。在本实验中,每次试验开始时会在两个图标之间进行选择,其中一个图标让猴子选择任务完成顺序,另一个图标则由计算机分配任务顺序。在任何一种情况下,受试者都必须完成相同数量的任务和相同数量的任务试验。任务相对简单,猴子在大多数试验中都能正确做出反应。因此,在不同条件下总体强化率大致相等。唯一的区别在于猴子是选择任务顺序还是由计算机分配任务顺序,从而将选择行为分离出来。在对任务图标有足够的体验后,当另一种选择是随机分配的任务顺序时,所有猴子都表现出对选择的显著偏好。在较小程度上,一些猴子在面对一种虽为首选但由计算机分配且与它们自己先前的选择相关联的任务顺序时,仍保持对选择的偏好。结果表明,当任务的所有其他方面都相同时,猴子更喜欢选择。

相似文献

1
Do monkeys choose to choose?
Learn Behav. 2014 Jun;42(2):164-75. doi: 10.3758/s13420-014-0135-0.
2
Irrational choice behavior in human and nonhuman primates.
Anim Cogn. 2018 Mar;21(2):227-234. doi: 10.1007/s10071-017-1156-9. Epub 2018 Jan 2.
3
Capuchin and rhesus monkeys show sunk cost effects in a psychomotor task.
Sci Rep. 2020 Nov 23;10(1):20396. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-77301-w.
5
Task switching in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) and tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) during computerized categorization tasks.
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2018 Jul;44(3):229-246. doi: 10.1037/xan0000174. Epub 2018 May 31.
6
Metamemory in tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).
Anim Cogn. 2009 Jul;12(4):575-85. doi: 10.1007/s10071-009-0217-0. Epub 2009 Feb 26.
7
Working and waiting for better rewards: self-control in two monkey species (Cebus apella and Macaca mulatta).
Behav Processes. 2014 Mar;103:236-42. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2014.01.001. Epub 2014 Jan 9.
9
Conceptual thresholds for same and different in old-(Macaca mulatta) and new-world (Cebus apella) monkeys.
Behav Processes. 2011 Mar;86(3):316-22. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2011.01.001. Epub 2011 Jan 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Abstinence from Substance Use & The Value of Control.
bioRxiv. 2025 May 8:2025.05.02.651720. doi: 10.1101/2025.05.02.651720.
2
Animal Welfare, Agency, and Animal-Computer Interaction.
Animals (Basel). 2025 Jan 15;15(2):219. doi: 10.3390/ani15020219.
4
A Touchscreen-Based, Multiple-Choice Approach to Cognitive Enrichment of Captive Rhesus Macaques ().
Animals (Basel). 2023 Aug 24;13(17):2702. doi: 10.3390/ani13172702.
5
Choice, control, and animal welfare: definitions and essential inquiries to advance animal welfare science.
Front Vet Sci. 2023 Aug 2;10:1250251. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1250251. eCollection 2023.
6
Intrinsic motivation for choice varies with individual risk attitudes and the controllability of the environment.
PLoS Comput Biol. 2023 Aug 11;19(8):e1010551. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010551. eCollection 2023 Aug.
7
Research Animal Behavioral Management Programs for the 21st Century.
Animals (Basel). 2023 Jun 8;13(12):1919. doi: 10.3390/ani13121919.
8
Applied behavior analysis and the zoo: Forthman and Ogden (1992) thirty years later.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2023 Jan;56(1):29-54. doi: 10.1002/jaba.969. Epub 2022 Dec 23.
9
Exploring How White-Faced Sakis Control Digital Visual Enrichment Systems.
Animals (Basel). 2021 Feb 20;11(2):557. doi: 10.3390/ani11020557.
10
Outcome expectancy and suboptimal risky choice in nonhuman primates.
Learn Behav. 2020 Sep;48(3):301-321. doi: 10.3758/s13420-019-00406-4.

本文引用的文献

1
Discounting the freedom to choose: implications for the paradox of choice.
Behav Processes. 2012 Jul;90(3):424-7. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2012.03.017. Epub 2012 Apr 6.
2
Born to choose: the origins and value of the need for control.
Trends Cogn Sci. 2010 Oct;14(10):457-63. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2010.08.001.
5
Escape from freedom: Choosing not to choose in pigeons.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1981 Jul;36(1):1-7. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1981.36-1.
6
Preference for free choice over forced choice in pigeons.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1980 Jul;34(1):77-86. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1980.34-77.
7
The tyranny of choice.
Sci Am. 2004 Apr;290(4):70-5. doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican0404-70.
8
Automation of learning-set testing: the video-task paradigm.
Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 1989;21(2):281-4. doi: 10.3758/bf03205596.
9
The NASA/LRC Computerized Test System.
Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 1990;22(2):127-31. doi: 10.3758/bf03203132.
10
Videotapes as enrichment for captive chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).
Zoo Biol. 2000;19(6):541-551. doi: 10.1002/1098-2361(2000)19:6<541::AID-ZOO6>3.0.CO;2-3.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验