Bruno Ventre Marta, Ferreri Andrés J M, Gospodarowicz Mary, Govi Silvia, Messina Carlo, Porter David, Radford John, Heo Dae Seog, Park Yeon, Martinelli Giovanni, Taylor Emma, Lucraft Helen, Hong Angela, Scarfò Lydia, Zucca Emanuele, Christie David
Unit of Lymphoid Malignancies, Department of Onco-Hematology, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital, Ontario Cancer Institute, Toronto, Canada; Auckland Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand; Christie Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom; Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea; Korea Cancer Center Hospital, Seoul, Korea; Division of Hematology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy, Wesley Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia; Northern Centre for Cancer, New Castle, United Kingdom; Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia; Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Bellinzona, Switzerland; Premion and Bond University, Tugun, Australia.
Oncologist. 2014 Mar;19(3):291-8. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2013-0249. Epub 2014 Feb 24.
The clinical features, management, and prognosis of stage I-II diffuse large B-cell lymphoma of the bone (PB-DLBCL) included in an international database of 499 lymphoma patients with skeletal involvement were reviewed.
HIV-negative patients (n = 161) with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma of the bone (PB-DLBCL) after complete staging workup were considered. The primary objective of this study was to identify the most effective treatment modality; the secondary objectives were to define the contribution of irradiation fields and doses and the pattern of relapse.
Median age was 55 years (range, 18-99 years), with a male/female ratio of 1:2; 141 (87%) patients had stage I, 14 (9%) had B symptoms, 37 (23%) had bulky lesion, 54 (33%) showed elevated lactate dehydrogenase serum levels, and 25 (15%) had fracture. Thirteen (8%) patients received chemotherapy alone, 23 (14%) received radiotherapy alone, and 125 (78%) received both treatments. The response to the first-line treatment was complete in 131 of 152 assessed patients (complete response rate, 86%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 81%-91%) and partial in 7, with an overall response rate of 91% (95% CI, 87%-95%). At a median follow-up of 54 months (range, 3-218), 107 (67%) patients remained relapse-free, with a 5-year progression-free survival of 68% (SE: 4). Four (2.5%) patients had meningeal relapse; 119 patients were alive (113 disease-free), with a 5-year overall survival of 75% (SE: 4). Patients managed with primary chemotherapy, whether followed by radiotherapy or not, had a significantly better outcome than patients treated with primary radiotherapy, whether followed by chemotherapy or not. The addition of consolidative radiotherapy after primary chemotherapy was not associated with improved outcome; doses >36 Gy and the irradiation of the whole affected bone were not associated with better outcome.
Patients with PB-DLBCL exhibit a favorable prognosis when treated with primary anthracycline-based chemotherapy whether followed by radiotherapy or not. In patients treated with chemoradiotherapy, the use of larger radiation fields and doses is not associated with better outcome. Central nervous system dissemination is a rare event in PB-DLBCL patients.
对纳入国际骨骼受累淋巴瘤患者数据库的499例患者中的I-II期骨弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤(PB-DLBCL)的临床特征、治疗及预后进行了回顾。
纳入经全面分期检查后确诊为骨弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤(PB-DLBCL)的HIV阴性患者(n = 161)。本研究的主要目的是确定最有效的治疗方式;次要目的是明确照射野和剂量的作用以及复发模式。
中位年龄为55岁(范围18 - 99岁),男女比例为1:2;141例(87%)患者为I期,14例(9%)有B症状,37例(23%)有大包块病变,54例(33%)血清乳酸脱氢酶水平升高,25例(15%)有骨折。13例(8%)患者仅接受化疗,23例(14%)仅接受放疗,125例(78%)接受了两种治疗。在152例接受评估的患者中,131例(完全缓解率86%;95%置信区间[CI],81% - 91%)对一线治疗完全缓解,7例部分缓解,总缓解率为91%(95% CI,87% - 95%)。中位随访54个月(范围3 - 218个月),107例(67%)患者无复发,5年无进展生存率为68%(标准误:4)。4例(2.5%)患者发生脑膜复发;119例患者存活(113例无病存活),5年总生存率为75%(标准误:4)。接受初始化疗的患者,无论后续是否接受放疗,其预后均显著优于接受初始放疗的患者,无论后续是否接受化疗。初始化疗后加用巩固性放疗并未改善预后;剂量>36 Gy以及对整个受累骨进行照射与更好的预后无关。
PB-DLBCL患者接受以蒽环类药物为基础的初始化疗时,无论后续是否接受放疗,预后均良好。在接受放化疗的患者中,使用更大的照射野和更高的剂量与更好的预后无关。中枢神经系统播散在PB-DLBCL患者中是罕见事件。