Hojo Masayuki, Iikura Motoyasu, Hirashima Junko, Suzuki Manabu, Sugiyama Haruhito
Division of Respiratory Medicine, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Respiratory Medicine, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Division of Respiratory Medicine, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Allergol Int. 2014 Mar;63(1):103-11. doi: 10.2332/allergolint.13-OA-0590.
The clinical usefulness of fixed-dose maintenance therapy with salmeterol/fluticasone (SFC) and budesonide/formoterol combination inhaler (BUD/FM) has been established, though evidence of the long-term anti-inflammatory effects of these 2 inhalers are limited.
Patients with moderate persistent adult asthma who had received SFC 50/250μg bid with well-control status were recruited. After switching to 8-week therapy with fixed-dose BUD/FM 4 puffs (640/18μg) (phase-1), patients chose either SFC or BUD/FM. FeNO and ACT score were evaluated every 8 weeks until the end of the 52-week treatment period for both treatment groups (phase-2).
In total, 103 patients were examined: BUD/FM was chosen by 34 patients (BUD/FM group), while SFC was chosen by 23 (SFC group). Thirty-six received SFC consistently from the beginning of the study (control). Patients in the BUD/FM and SFC groups showed significant improvements in ACT scores and FeNO levels in phase-1; these beneficial effects persisted for 52 weeks in the BUD/FM group. On the other hand, in the SFC group, although the FeNO level decreased from 54.3 ± 26.4 ppb to 41.9 ± 18.3 ppb in phase-1, it increased to 54.5 ± 26.2 ppb, a level similar to the baseline prior to the beginning of BUD/FM therapy, at 8 weeks in phase-2, and remained at 50-odd ppb thereafter.
These results suggest that maintenance therapy with fixed-dose BUD/FM is a useful treatment option exerting an airway anti-inflammatory effect for a period as long as 1 year, even for asthmatics who could not accomplish total control with SFC.
沙美特罗/氟替卡松(SFC)和布地奈德/福莫特罗联合吸入器(BUD/FM)固定剂量维持治疗的临床效用已得到证实,不过这两种吸入器长期抗炎作用的证据有限。
招募接受SFC 50/250μg每日两次且病情控制良好的中度持续性成年哮喘患者。在改用固定剂量BUD/FM 4吸(640/18μg)进行8周治疗后(第一阶段),患者选择SFC或BUD/FM。在两个治疗组的52周治疗期结束前,每8周评估一次呼出气一氧化氮(FeNO)和哮喘控制测试(ACT)评分(第二阶段)。
总共检查了103例患者:34例患者选择了BUD/FM(BUD/FM组),23例选择了SFC(SFC组)。36例从研究开始就一直使用SFC(对照组)。BUD/FM组和SFC组患者在第一阶段的ACT评分和FeNO水平均有显著改善;这些有益效果在BUD/FM组持续了52周。另一方面,在SFC组中,尽管FeNO水平在第一阶段从54.3±26.4 ppb降至41.9±18.3 ppb,但在第二阶段8周时又升至54.5±26.2 ppb,与开始BUD/FM治疗前的基线水平相似,此后一直保持在50多ppb。
这些结果表明,固定剂量BUD/FM维持治疗是一种有用的治疗选择,即使对于无法通过SFC实现完全控制的哮喘患者,也能在长达1年的时间内发挥气道抗炎作用。