Suppr超能文献

中风幸存者的大动脉僵硬度和颈动脉血流搏动性

Large artery stiffness and carotid flow pulsatility in stroke survivors.

作者信息

Wohlfahrt Peter, Krajcoviechova Alena, Jozifova Marie, Mayer Otto, Vanek Jiri, Filipovsky Jan, Laurent Stephane, Cifkova Renata

机构信息

aCenter for Cardiovascular Prevention of the First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Thomayer Hospital, Prague bInternational Clinical Research Center, St Ann's University Hospital, Brno cDepartment of Preventive Cardiology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague d2nd Department of Internal Medicine, Charles University, Center for Hypertension, Pilsen, Czech Republic eDepartment of Pharmacology, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, INSERM U970 and Paris University Descartes, Paris, France fDepartment of Cardiology and Angiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.

出版信息

J Hypertens. 2014 May;32(5):1097-103; discussion 1103. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000000137.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Aortic stiffness is increased in lacunar stroke. The precise mechanism linking aortic stiffness to symptomatic lacunar stroke is not well understood. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of aortic stiffness, carotid stiffness, central blood pressure, and cerebrovascular resistance on carotid flow pulsatility according to stroke subtype.

METHODS

Two hundred and one consecutive patients were examined 13 months after hospitalization for their first-ever ischemic stroke. The stroke subtype was classified using the Causative Classification of Stroke System. Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV) was used as a measure of aortic stiffness. Common carotid flow pulsatility was expressed as resistive index. Central blood pressure was measured using applanation tonometry.

RESULTS

Complete data were available for 174 patients (mean age… 67 ± 10 years, 64% men). In patients with lacunar stroke, aortic PWV was higher (13.11 ± 2.74 m/s) than in individuals with large artery atherosclerosis (9.98 ± 1.87 m/s, P <0.001), cardioembolic (11.31 ± 3.18 m/s, P = 0.04) or cryptogenic stroke (11.13 ± 3.2 m/s, P = 0.01). Similarly, central SBP and resistive index were higher in patients with lacunar stroke (145 ± 23 mmHg and 0.80 ± 0.04, respectively) than those with large artery atherosclerosis (128 ± 18 mmHg, P <0.01 and 0.74 ± 0.07, P <0.01, respectively) or cryptogenic stroke (132 ± 18 mmHg, P <0.01 and 0.76 ± 0.07, P <0.05, respectively). In multivariate analysis, aortic stiffness and central pulse pressure were the main determinants of resistive index independent of stroke subtype.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that aortic stiffening, by reducing the buffering function of the aorta and thereby increasing the transmission of pressure and flow pulsatility into the cerebral arterioles, may contribute to the pathogenesis of lacunar stroke.

摘要

目的

腔隙性卒中患者的主动脉僵硬度增加。主动脉僵硬度与有症状腔隙性卒中之间的确切机制尚不清楚。本研究旨在根据卒中亚型比较主动脉僵硬度、颈动脉僵硬度、中心血压和脑血管阻力对颈动脉血流搏动性的影响。

方法

对201例首次缺血性卒中住院13个月后的连续患者进行检查。使用卒中病因分类系统对卒中亚型进行分类。颈股脉搏波速度(PWV)用作主动脉僵硬度的指标。颈总动脉血流搏动性用阻力指数表示。使用压平式眼压计测量中心血压。

结果

174例患者(平均年龄……67±10岁,64%为男性)可获得完整数据。在腔隙性卒中患者中,主动脉PWV(13.11±2.74m/s)高于大动脉粥样硬化患者(9.98±1.87m/s,P<0.001)、心源性栓塞患者(11.31±3.18m/s,P=0.04)或隐源性卒中患者(11.13±3.2m/s,P=0.01)。同样,腔隙性卒中患者的中心收缩压和阻力指数(分别为145±23mmHg和0.80±0.04)高于大动脉粥样硬化患者(分别为128±18mmHg,P<0.01和0.74±0.07,P<0.01)或隐源性卒中患者(分别为132±18mmHg,P<0.01和0.76±0.07,P<0.05)。在多变量分析中,主动脉僵硬度和中心脉压是独立于卒中亚型的阻力指数的主要决定因素。

结论

我们的结果表明,主动脉硬化通过降低主动脉的缓冲功能,从而增加压力和血流搏动性向脑小动脉的传递,可能有助于腔隙性卒中的发病机制。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验