Dionet C, Oberlin O, Habrand J L, Vilcoq J, Madelain M, Dutou L, Bey P, Lefur R, Thierry P, Le Floch O
Centre Jean Perrin, Place Henri Dunant, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1988 Aug;15(2):341-6. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(98)90013-x.
To minimize the drawbacks of treatment we had shown in a previous study that it was possible after chemotherapy to limit the radiation fields to the involved areas only. Pursuing our policy of deescalation, we started in January 1982 a study in 29 French pediatric and hematologic centers, with two aims: (1) To compare the efficacy of 4 cycles of two different chemotherapeutic regimens (4 ABVD vs 2 MOPP + ABVD) in early stages (CSIA and II A) while other stages would receive 6 cycles of the same regimen (3 MOPP + 3 ABVD); (2) To evaluate the efficacy of irradiation given at a low dose (20 Gy) in the patients who had a minimum 70% reduction of the size of their nodes (good responders). From January 1982 to March 1987, 174 patients were entered in this study, of whom 157 completed their treatment program at the time of analysis. On completion of chemotherapy, 94% were considered as good responders and were irradiated to 20 Gy. Only 6 patients received a mediastinal boost (up to 40 Gy). Of the 6% (10/157) poor responders a complete remission was obtained in 6 after 40 Gy. Among the good responders, 5 patients relapsed, with only 3 within an area irradiated to 20 Gy. So that 4 nodal relapses occurred among 364 involved lymph areas. The actuarial survival at 42 months (median 30 months) is 95% (IA + IIA = 100%, IB + IIB + III = 94% and IV = 80%) and the disease-free survival 88% (respectively 94, 93 and 54). Until now there is no statistically significant difference between the 2 randomized arms. This study shows that it is possible to achieve a durable remission in most children treated with a less toxic protocol eliminating or reducing Nitrogen Mustard and reducing the dose of irradiation. Less late complications and sequelae are expected with a longer follow-up.
为了将治疗的弊端降至最低,我们在之前的一项研究中表明,化疗后仅将放疗野局限于受累区域是可行的。遵循我们的降阶梯策略,我们于1982年1月在29个法国儿科和血液学中心启动了一项研究,有两个目标:(1)比较两种不同化疗方案的4个周期(4个ABVD方案与2个MOPP + ABVD方案)在早期阶段(CSIA和II A期)的疗效,而其他阶段将接受相同方案的6个周期(3个MOPP + 3个ABVD方案);(2)评估在淋巴结大小至少缩小70%的患者(良好反应者)中给予低剂量(20 Gy)放疗的疗效。从1982年1月至1987年3月,174例患者进入该研究,其中157例在分析时完成了治疗方案。化疗完成后,94%的患者被视为良好反应者,并接受了20 Gy的放疗。只有6例患者接受了纵隔增强放疗(剂量高达40 Gy)。在6%(10/157)的不良反应者中,6例在接受40 Gy放疗后获得完全缓解。在良好反应者中,5例复发,其中仅3例在接受20 Gy放疗的区域内复发。因此,在364个受累淋巴区域中发生了4例淋巴结复发。42个月(中位时间30个月)的精算生存率为95%(IA + IIA期 = 100%,IB + IIB + III期 = 94%,IV期 = 80%),无病生存率为88%(分别为94%、93%和54%)。到目前为止,两个随机分组的组间没有统计学上的显著差异。这项研究表明,用毒性较小的方案治疗大多数儿童,消除或减少氮芥并降低放疗剂量,有可能实现持久缓解。随着更长时间的随访,预计晚期并发症和后遗症会更少。