Cherny N I, Portenoy R K
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 1993 Jan 1;3(2):7-26. doi: 10.3233/BMR-1993-3205.
Chronic pain is experienced by approximately one-third of all cancer patients and as many as 70 to 90% of those with advanced disease.1 Although established pharmacotherapeutic strategies have been demonstrated to benefit most patients, undertreatment remains common.1 This unacceptable situation must be remedied; relief of cancer pain is an ethical imperative and it is incumbent upon clinicians to maximize the knowledge, skill, and diligence needed to attend to this task.2Analgesic pharmacotherapy is the mainstay approach in the management of cancer pain.3,4 Optimal therapy depends on an understanding of the clinical pharmacology of analgesic drugs and comprehensive assessment of the pain, medical condition, and psychosocial status of the patient. Through a process of repeated evaluations, therapy with opioid, nonopioid, and adjuvant analgesics is individualized to achieve and maintain a favorable balance between pain relief and adverse effects.An expert committee convened by the Cancer Unit of the World Health Organization has proposed a useful approach to drug selection for cancer pain, which has become known as the "analgesic ladder" (Fig. 1).3 When combined with appropriate dosing guidelines, this approach is capable of providing adequate relief to 70 to 90% of patients.5-9 Emphasizing that the intensity of pain, rather than its specific etiology, should be the prime consideration in analgesic selection, the approach advocates the following three basic steps:Step 1. Patients with mild to moderate cancer-related pain should be treated with a nonopioid analgesic, which should be combined with an adjuvant analgesic if a specific indication for one exists.Step 2. Patients who are relatively nontolerant and present with moderate to severe pain, or who tail to achieve adequate relief after a trial of a nonopioid analgesic, should be treated with a socalled "weak" opioid; this drug is typically combined with a nonopioid and may be coadministered with an adjuvant analgesic or other adjuvant drug, if there is an indication for one.Step 3. Patients who present with severe pain, or fail to achieve adequate relief following appropriate administration of drugs on the second rung of the analgesic ladder, should receive a so-called strong opioid, which may be combined with a nonopioid analgesic or an adjuvant drug as indicated.
约三分之一的癌症患者会经历慢性疼痛,而晚期癌症患者中这一比例高达70%至90%。尽管已证实既定的药物治疗策略能使大多数患者受益,但治疗不足的情况仍然普遍。这种不可接受的状况必须得到纠正;缓解癌症疼痛是一项道德责任,临床医生有责任最大限度地运用处理此项任务所需的知识、技能和勤勉。镇痛药物治疗是癌症疼痛管理的主要方法。最佳治疗取决于对镇痛药物临床药理学的理解以及对患者疼痛、医疗状况和心理社会状态的全面评估。通过反复评估的过程,使用阿片类、非阿片类和辅助镇痛药进行个体化治疗,以在疼痛缓解和不良反应之间实现并维持良好的平衡。世界卫生组织癌症部门召集的一个专家委员会提出了一种有用的癌症疼痛药物选择方法,即所谓的“镇痛阶梯”(图1)。当与适当的给药指南相结合时,这种方法能够为70%至90%的患者提供充分的缓解。该方法强调,在选择镇痛药时,应首要考虑疼痛的强度而非其具体病因,并提倡以下三个基本步骤:步骤1. 轻度至中度癌症相关疼痛的患者应使用非阿片类镇痛药治疗,如果有使用辅助镇痛药的特定指征,则应将其与辅助镇痛药联合使用。步骤2. 相对未产生耐受性且有中度至重度疼痛的患者,或在试用非阿片类镇痛药后未能获得充分缓解的患者,应使用所谓的“弱”阿片类药物治疗;该药物通常与非阿片类药物联合使用,如果有使用指征,也可与辅助镇痛药或其他辅助药物同时使用。步骤3. 出现重度疼痛或在镇痛阶梯的第二个层级适当用药后未能获得充分缓解的患者,应使用所谓的强阿片类药物,可根据需要与非阿片类镇痛药或辅助药物联合使用。