Bézard G, Pezzei C, Hertz H
Unfallkrankenhaus Lorenz-Böhler, Unfallchirurgie, Wien, Österreich.
Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2014 Feb;46(1):2-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1363660. Epub 2014 Feb 26.
This study evaluates the short-term radiological outcome of K-wire osteosynthesis (KWO) in comparison to the fixed-angle-plate osteosynthesis (ORIF) on distal radius fractures in elderly patients (aged 80 years or more) with osteoporotic bones.
This study retrospectivly compares the postoperative X-rays of distal radius fractures (obtained between the years of 1998-2009) of patients aged 80 years and above treated with KWO (228 fractures, mean age 85 years), with the results of patients who were treated with fixed-angle plate ORIF (120 fractures, mean age 84 years). Within the KWO results, we also further compared the radiological results of a static and a dynamic (Kapandji) KWO technique. Only patients with a postoperative, anatomic reduction, and those who were radiologically followed up in a period of 2 months and above were included. The radiological criteria included the palmar and radial inclination as well as the radial shortening.
With KWO performed in a static technique, 24% of the postoperative results showed no reduction loss. The use of the dynamic Kapandji technique KWO, improved the positive results to 63%. However, almost a third of the fractures (30%) treated with KWO, had shifted back to their preoperative positions, or worsened overall. The fixed angle plate (ORIF) was able to maintain 76% of all fractures in their postoperative positions. Merely 1.7% of the ORIF group sustained a complete reduction loss. The fixed-angle plate osteosynthesis shows a significant decrease of cases in which a complete repositioning loss is experienced.
Although the importance of anatomic reconstruction of distal radius fractures is often debated in cases involving elderly patients, it is our considered opinion that, should an operative solution be chosen, one should consider the fixed-angle-plate osteosynthesis as the preferred operation method to prevent loss of reduction.
本研究评估克氏针骨接合术(KWO)与老年(80岁及以上)骨质疏松性桡骨远端骨折的角度固定钢板骨接合术(切开复位内固定术,ORIF)相比的短期放射学结果。
本研究回顾性比较了采用KWO治疗的80岁及以上患者(228例骨折,平均年龄85岁)和采用角度固定钢板切开复位内固定术治疗的患者(120例骨折,平均年龄84岁)桡骨远端骨折的术后X线片(1998年至2009年间获得)。在KWO结果中,我们还进一步比较了静态和动态(卡潘迪)KWO技术的放射学结果。仅纳入术后解剖复位且放射学随访2个月及以上的患者。放射学标准包括掌倾角、桡倾角以及桡骨短缩情况。
采用静态技术的KWO,24%的术后结果显示无复位丢失。采用动态卡潘迪技术的KWO使阳性结果提高到63%。然而,几乎三分之一接受KWO治疗的骨折(30%)已恢复到术前位置或总体情况恶化。角度固定钢板(切开复位内固定术)能够使所有骨折中的76%维持在术后位置。切开复位内固定术组仅有1.7%发生完全复位丢失。角度固定钢板骨接合术显示完全复位丢失的病例显著减少。
尽管在老年患者的病例中,桡骨远端骨折解剖重建的重要性常常存在争议,但我们经过深思熟虑的观点是,如果选择手术解决方案,应将角度固定钢板骨接合术视为预防复位丢失的首选手术方法。