Suppr超能文献

[外固定器是否不再适用于老年不稳定桡骨骨折的治疗?]

[Is use of the fixateur externe no longer indicated for the treatment of unstable radial fracture in the elderly?].

作者信息

Ochman S, Frerichmann U, Armsen N, Raschke M J, Meffert R H

机构信息

Klinik und Poliklinik für Unfall-, Hand- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Münster, Waldeyerstr. 1, 48149, Münster, Germany.

出版信息

Unfallchirurg. 2006 Dec;109(12):1050-7. doi: 10.1007/s00113-006-1166-6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In recent years there has been an increasingly marked shift in the operative treatment of unstable fractures of the distal radius. The introduction of locking compression plates has made it possible to extend the indications for palmar stabilisation according to the principles of internal fixation to extension fractures even in osteoporotic bone, and since then the new design has been used more and more widely. First clinical results show very good and good clinical and radiological outcomes in over 80% of cases after locking compression plate osteosynthesis. All this raises the question of whether external fixation is no longer indicated for distal radius fractures in the elderly, or is now no more than a second-line treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Within a 5-year period, 67 patients over 65 years of age were identified among 220 who had had unstable fractures of the distal radius in our hospital with external fixation. The average follow-up period (clinical and radiological examinations) was 37 months. We devoted particular attention to the analysis of complications and problems during the treatment.

RESULTS

Complete bone healing was observed in all patients treated with external fixation. In most cases, complications were minor pin-track infections (10%). The radiological follow-up examination revealed radial shortening by an average of 2 mm and an average radial shift of 0.2 mm. The joint angle was 2.5 degrees with lateral irradiation and 18 degrees with dorso-palmar irradiation. According to the Gartland and Werley score, the functional, radiological and subjective outcome was excellent or good in 87% of these patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, internal fixation with angular fixed plates has definite benefits. The medium- and long-term follow-up and functional outcome still show no benefits over external fixation, however. External fixation is a genuine option, even if as second-line treatment.

摘要

背景

近年来,桡骨远端不稳定骨折的手术治疗发生了日益显著的转变。锁定加压钢板的引入使得根据内固定原则将掌侧稳定的适应证扩展至伸展型骨折成为可能,甚至在骨质疏松性骨中也适用,自那时起这种新设计的应用越来越广泛。初步临床结果显示,在锁定加压钢板接骨术后超过80%的病例中,临床和影像学结果非常好或良好。所有这些都引发了一个问题,即老年桡骨远端骨折是否不再适合采用外固定,或者现在外固定仅仅是二线治疗方法。

患者与方法

在5年时间里,我们医院220例桡骨远端不稳定骨折患者中,有67例年龄超过65岁采用了外固定治疗。平均随访期(临床和影像学检查)为37个月。我们特别关注治疗过程中的并发症和问题分析。

结果

所有接受外固定治疗的患者均实现了完全骨愈合。在大多数情况下,并发症为轻微的针道感染(10%)。影像学随访检查显示,桡骨平均短缩2mm,平均桡侧移位0.2mm。侧位照射时关节角度为2.5度,背掌位照射时为18度。根据Gartland和Werley评分,这些患者中87%的功能、影像学和主观结果为优或良。

结论

总体而言,角形固定板内固定有明确的益处。然而,中长期随访和功能结果与外固定相比仍无优势。外固定是一种切实可行的选择,即使作为二线治疗方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验