Department of Biological Science, Florida State University, , Tallahassee, FL 32306, USA, Max Plank Institute for Developmental Biology, , Tuebingen 70276, Germany, Department of Entomology, University of Wisconsin, , Madison, WI 53706, USA.
Proc Biol Sci. 2014 Feb 26;281(1781):20132310. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2013.2310. Print 2014 Apr 22.
A major goal of modern evolutionary biology is to understand the causes and consequences of phenotypic plasticity, the ability of a single genotype to produce multiple phenotypes in response to variable environments. While ecological and quantitative genetic studies have evaluated models of the evolution of adaptive plasticity, some long-standing questions about plasticity require more mechanistic approaches. Here, we address two of those questions: does plasticity facilitate adaptive evolution? And do physiological costs place limits on plasticity? We examine these questions by comparing genetically and plastically regulated behavioural variation in sailfin mollies (Poecilia latipinna), which exhibit striking variation in plasticity for male mating behaviour. In this species, some genotypes respond plastically to a change in the social environment by switching between primarily courting and primarily sneaking behaviour. In contrast, other genotypes have fixed mating strategies (either courting or sneaking) and do not display plasticity. We found that genetic and plastic variation in behaviour were accompanied by partially, but not completely overlapping changes in brain gene expression, in partial support of models that predict that plasticity can facilitate adaptive evolution. We also found that behavioural plasticity was accompanied by broader and more robust changes in brain gene expression, suggesting a substantial physiological cost to plasticity. We also observed that sneaking behaviour, but not courting, was associated with upregulation of genes involved in learning and memory, suggesting that sneaking is more cognitively demanding than courtship.
现代进化生物学的一个主要目标是理解表型可塑性的原因和后果,即单一基因型在应对多变环境时产生多种表型的能力。虽然生态和数量遗传学研究已经评估了适应性可塑性进化的模型,但关于可塑性的一些长期存在的问题需要更具机制性的方法。在这里,我们解决了其中两个问题:可塑性是否有助于适应性进化?生理成本是否限制了可塑性?我们通过比较帆鳍脂鲤(Poecilia latipinna)中遗传和可塑性调节的行为变异来研究这些问题,该鱼对雄性交配行为表现出惊人的可塑性变化。在这个物种中,一些基因型通过在求爱和偷袭行为之间切换,对社会环境的变化做出可塑性反应。相比之下,其他基因型具有固定的交配策略(求爱或偷袭),并且不表现出可塑性。我们发现,行为的遗传和可塑性变化伴随着脑基因表达的部分但不完全重叠的变化,部分支持了预测可塑性可以促进适应性进化的模型。我们还发现,行为可塑性伴随着更广泛和更稳健的脑基因表达变化,表明可塑性具有相当大的生理成本。我们还观察到,偷袭行为而不是求爱行为与参与学习和记忆的基因的上调有关,这表明偷袭比求爱更需要认知能力。