Corresponding author: Louise Bordeleau,
Diabetes Care. 2014;37(5):1360-6. doi: 10.2337/dc13-1468. Epub 2014 Feb 26.
OBJECTIVE Epidemiologic studies linking insulin glargine and glucose-lowering therapies to cancers and n-3 fatty acids to cancer prevention have not been confirmed. We aimed to assess the effect of insulin glargine and n-3 fatty acids on incident cancers within the context of the ORIGIN (Outcome Reduction with Initial Glargine Intervention) trial. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS The ORIGIN trial is an international, long-term, randomized two-by-two factorial study comparing insulin glargine with standard care and n-3 fatty acids with placebo (double blind) in people with dysglycemia at high risk for cardiovascular events. The primary outcome measure (cancer substudy) was the occurrence of any new or recurrent adjudicated cancer. Cancer mortality and cancer subtypes were also analyzed. RESULTS Among 12,537 people (mean age 63.5 years, SD 7.8; 4,388 females), 953 developed a cancer event during the median follow-up of 6.2 years. In the glargine and standard care groups, the incidence of cancers was 1.32 and 1.32 per 100 person-years, respectively (P = 0.97), and in the n-3 fatty acid and placebo groups, it was 1.28 and 1.36 per 100 person-years, respectively (P = 0.39). No difference in the effect of either intervention was noted within predefined subgroups (P for all interactions ≥0.17). Cancer-related mortality and cancer-specific outcomes also did not differ between groups. Postrandomization HbA1c levels, glucose-lowering therapies (including metformin), and BMI did not affect cancer outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Insulin glargine and n-3 fatty acids have a neutral association with overall and cancer-specific outcomes, including cancer-specific mortality. Exposure to glucose-lowering therapies, including metformin, and HbA1c level during the study did not alter cancer risk.
将胰岛素甘精和降糖治疗与癌症联系起来,以及将 n-3 脂肪酸与癌症预防联系起来的流行病学研究尚未得到证实。我们旨在评估胰岛素甘精和 n-3 脂肪酸在 ORIGIN(初始甘精干预结果减少)试验背景下对癌症发病的影响。
ORIGIN 试验是一项国际性、长期、随机、两因素、两水平的研究,比较了在有发生心血管事件高危因素的血糖异常患者中,胰岛素甘精与标准治疗以及 n-3 脂肪酸与安慰剂(双盲)的效果。主要终点(癌症子研究)是任何新的或复发的经裁决的癌症的发生。还分析了癌症死亡率和癌症亚型。
在 12537 人中(平均年龄 63.5 岁,标准差 7.8;4388 名女性),中位随访 6.2 年期间,有 953 人发生癌症事件。在甘精和标准治疗组中,癌症的发病率分别为 1.32 和 1.32/100 人年(P=0.97),而在 n-3 脂肪酸和安慰剂组中,分别为 1.28 和 1.36/100 人年(P=0.39)。在预先定义的亚组中,两种干预措施的效果没有差异(所有交互作用的 P 值均≥0.17)。两组之间的癌症相关死亡率和癌症特异性结局也没有差异。随机分组后的 HbA1c 水平、降糖治疗(包括二甲双胍)和 BMI 并未影响癌症结局。
胰岛素甘精和 n-3 脂肪酸与总体和癌症特异性结局(包括癌症特异性死亡率)呈中性关联。在研究期间,接受降糖治疗(包括二甲双胍)和 HbA1c 水平不会改变癌症风险。