Suppr超能文献

嗓音治疗的就诊率:跨学科护理模式会有影响吗?

Attendance in voice therapy: can an interdisciplinary care model have an impact?

作者信息

Starmer Heather M, Liu Zaneta, Akst Lee M, Gourin Christine

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland.

出版信息

Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2014 Feb;123(2):117-23. doi: 10.1177/0003489414523708.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We sought to determine the effect of referral patterns on attendance in voice therapy.

METHODS

Patients who were seen by a laryngologist for vocal concerns and referred for voice therapy comprised the study population. Outcomes were compared between those who were initially evaluated through the interdisciplinary voice clinic (IDC), which combined speech-language pathology and laryngology care, and those who were evaluated by a laryngologist alone. Adherence was measured by completion of the plan of care.

RESULTS

There were 79 patients evaluated through the IDC and 100 patients evaluated initially by a laryngologist. Patients evaluated through the IDC had more visits with the speech-language pathologist (mean, 3.1 versus 1.24; p < 0.0001). Those initially evaluated through the IDC were more likely to complete their plan of care (p = 0.02). Completion of voice therapy was significantly more likely for individuals coded as being of "other" race (odds ratio, 7.98; p = 0.002) and for patients who participated in the IDC (odds ratio, 2.56; p = 0.018). The cause of dysphonia, sex, marital status, insurance status, days from laryngology referral to the initial speech-language pathologist consultation, the initial Voice-Related Quality of Life score, and distance to the clinic were not associated with patient attendance.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients evaluated in a coordinated IDC should be more likely to attend voice therapy and complete their plan of care, regardless of other factors.

摘要

目的

我们试图确定转诊模式对嗓音治疗就诊率的影响。

方法

因嗓音问题由喉科医生诊治并被转诊至嗓音治疗的患者构成了研究人群。对那些最初通过跨学科嗓音诊所(IDC)进行评估的患者(该诊所结合了言语病理学和喉科学护理)与那些仅由喉科医生评估的患者的结果进行比较。通过护理计划的完成情况来衡量依从性。

结果

通过IDC评估的患者有79例,最初由喉科医生评估的患者有100例。通过IDC评估的患者与言语病理学家的就诊次数更多(平均次数分别为3.1次和1.24次;p<0.0001)。那些最初通过IDC评估的患者更有可能完成他们的护理计划(p = 0.02)。被编码为“其他”种族的个体(优势比为7.98;p = 0.002)以及参与IDC的患者(优势比为2.56;p = 0.018)完成嗓音治疗的可能性显著更高。发声障碍的原因、性别、婚姻状况、保险状况、从喉科转诊到最初言语病理学家会诊的天数、最初的嗓音相关生活质量评分以及到诊所的距离与患者就诊率无关。

结论

无论其他因素如何,在协调的IDC中接受评估的患者应该更有可能参加嗓音治疗并完成他们的护理计划。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验