Suppr超能文献

量化触觉的感觉和情感感知:无毛皮肤和有毛皮肤之间的差异。

Quantifying the sensory and emotional perception of touch: differences between glabrous and hairy skin.

作者信息

Ackerley Rochelle, Saar Karin, McGlone Francis, Backlund Wasling Helena

机构信息

Department of Physiology, University of Gothenburg Gothenburg, Sweden ; Clinical Neurophysiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital Gothenburg, Sweden ; School of Natural Sciences and Psychology, Liverpool John Moores University Liverpool, UK.

Clinical Neurophysiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital Gothenburg, Sweden.

出版信息

Front Behav Neurosci. 2014 Feb 11;8:34. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00034. eCollection 2014.

Abstract

The perception of touch is complex and there has been a lack of ways to describe the full tactile experience quantitatively. Guest et al. (2011) developed a Touch Perception Task (TPT) in order to capture such experiences, and here we used the TPT to examine differences in sensory and emotional aspects of touch at different skin sites. We compared touch on three skin sites: the hairy arm and cheek, and the glabrous palm. The hairy skin contains C-tactile (CT) afferents, which play a role in affective touch, whereas glabrous skin does not contain CT afferents and is involved in more discriminative touch. In healthy volunteers, three different materials (soft brush, sandpaper, fur) were stroked across these skin sites during self-touch or experimenter-applied touch. After each stimulus, participants rated the tactile experience using descriptors in the TPT. Sensory and emotional descriptors were analyzed using factor analyses. Five sensory factors were found: Texture, Pile, Moisture, Heat/Sharp and Cold/Slip, and three emotional factors: Positive Affect, Arousal, and Negative Affect. Significant differences were found in the use of descriptors in touch to hairy vs. glabrous skin: this was most evident in touch on forearm skin, which produced higher emotional content. The touch from another was also judged as more emotionally positive then self-touch, and participants readily discriminated between the materials on all factors. The TPT successfully probed sensory and emotional percepts of the touch experience, which aided in identifying skin where emotional touch was more pertinent. It also highlights the potentially important role for CTs in the affective processing of inter-personal touch, in combination with higher-order influences, such as through cultural belonging and previous experiences.

摘要

触觉感知十分复杂,一直缺乏定量描述完整触觉体验的方法。Guest等人(2011年)开发了一种触觉感知任务(TPT)来捕捉此类体验,在此我们使用TPT来研究不同皮肤部位触觉在感官和情感方面的差异。我们比较了三个皮肤部位的触觉:有毛发的手臂和脸颊,以及无毛的手掌。有毛发的皮肤含有C触觉(CT)传入神经,其在情感触觉中起作用,而无毛皮肤不含有CT传入神经,参与更具辨别性的触觉。在健康志愿者中,在自我触摸或实验者施加触摸时,用三种不同材料(软刷、砂纸、皮毛)划过这些皮肤部位。每次刺激后,参与者使用TPT中的描述词对触觉体验进行评分。使用因子分析对感官和情感描述词进行分析。发现了五个感官因子:质地、绒毛、湿度、热/刺痛和冷/滑,以及三个情感因子:积极情感、唤醒和消极情感。在触摸有毛发皮肤与无毛皮肤时描述词的使用上发现了显著差异:这在前臂皮肤的触摸中最为明显,其产生了更高的情感内容。来自他人的触摸在情感上也被判断为比自我触摸更积极,并且参与者能够在所有因子上轻松区分不同材料。TPT成功地探究了触觉体验的感官和情感感知,这有助于识别情感触觉更相关的皮肤部位。它还强调了CTs在人际触摸的情感处理中与更高层次影响(如通过文化归属和以往经历)相结合的潜在重要作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ad8/3920190/06d031b33fe5/fnbeh-08-00034-g0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Quantifying the sensory and emotional perception of touch: differences between glabrous and hairy skin.
Front Behav Neurosci. 2014 Feb 11;8:34. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00034. eCollection 2014.
2
Touching and feeling: differences in pleasant touch processing between glabrous and hairy skin in humans.
Eur J Neurosci. 2012 Jun;35(11):1782-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2012.08092.x. Epub 2012 May 17.
3
Pleasantness of touch in human glabrous and hairy skin: order effects on affective ratings.
Brain Res. 2011 Oct 12;1417:9-15. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2011.08.011. Epub 2011 Aug 11.
4
Pleasantness ratings in response to affective touch across hairy and glabrous skin: A meta-analysis.
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021 Dec;131:88-95. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.09.026. Epub 2021 Sep 16.
5
Evidence for sparse C-tactile afferent innervation of glabrous human hand skin.
J Neurophysiol. 2021 Jan 1;125(1):232-237. doi: 10.1152/jn.00587.2020. Epub 2020 Dec 9.
6
The perception of affective and discriminative touch in blind individuals.
Behav Brain Res. 2023 Apr 27;444:114361. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2023.114361. Epub 2023 Feb 24.
7
Stroking hardness changes the perception of affective touch pleasantness across different skin sites.
Heliyon. 2019 Aug 12;5(8):e02141. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02141. eCollection 2019 Aug.
8
Touch perceptions across skin sites: differences between sensitivity, direction discrimination and pleasantness.
Front Behav Neurosci. 2014 Feb 19;8:54. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00054. eCollection 2014.
9
Touch-induced pupil size reflects stimulus intensity, not subjective pleasantness.
Exp Brain Res. 2019 Jan;237(1):201-210. doi: 10.1007/s00221-018-5404-2. Epub 2018 Oct 29.
10
C-tactile afferent stimulating touch carries a positive affective value.
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 10;12(3):e0173457. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173457. eCollection 2017.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring Tactile Initiation of Joint Attention in Autistic Children.
Res Child Adolesc Psychopathol. 2025 May 6. doi: 10.1007/s10802-025-01325-x.
2
Texture perception at the foot sole: comparison between walking, sitting, and to the hand.
J Neurophysiol. 2024 Sep 1;132(3):643-652. doi: 10.1152/jn.00170.2024. Epub 2024 Jul 17.
3
To touch or to be touched? comparing appraisal of vicarious execution and reception of interpersonal touch.
PLoS One. 2024 May 17;19(5):e0293164. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293164. eCollection 2024.
4
Perceptuo-affective organization of touched materials in younger and older adults.
PLoS One. 2024 Jan 22;19(1):e0296633. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296633. eCollection 2024.
8
Perception and Appreciation of Tactile Objects: The Role of Visual Experience and Texture Parameters.
J Percept Imaging. 2022 Jan;5. doi: 10.2352/J.Percept.Imaging.2022.5.000405.
9
Affective touch in the context of development, oxytocin signaling, and autism.
Front Psychol. 2022 Nov 23;13:967791. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.967791. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Touch perceptions across skin sites: differences between sensitivity, direction discrimination and pleasantness.
Front Behav Neurosci. 2014 Feb 19;8:54. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00054. eCollection 2014.
2
An fMRI study on cortical responses during active self-touch and passive touch from others.
Front Behav Neurosci. 2012 Aug 7;6:51. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2012.00051. eCollection 2012.
3
Rasch-Built Measure of Pleasant Touch through Active Fingertip Exploration.
Front Neurorobot. 2012 Jun 21;6:5. doi: 10.3389/fnbot.2012.00005. eCollection 2012.
4
Primary somatosensory cortex discriminates affective significance in social touch.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Jun 19;109(25):E1657-66. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1113211109. Epub 2012 Jun 4.
5
Touching and feeling: differences in pleasant touch processing between glabrous and hairy skin in humans.
Eur J Neurosci. 2012 Jun;35(11):1782-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2012.08092.x. Epub 2012 May 17.
6
Defensive peripersonal space: the blink reflex evoked by hand stimulation is increased when the hand is near the face.
J Neurophysiol. 2012 Feb;107(3):880-9. doi: 10.1152/jn.00731.2011. Epub 2011 Nov 16.
7
Pleasantness of touch in human glabrous and hairy skin: order effects on affective ratings.
Brain Res. 2011 Oct 12;1417:9-15. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2011.08.011. Epub 2011 Aug 11.
8
Vicarious responses to social touch in posterior insular cortex are tuned to pleasant caressing speeds.
J Neurosci. 2011 Jun 29;31(26):9554-62. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0397-11.2011.
9
Significance of the insula for the evolution of human awareness of feelings from the body.
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2011 Apr;1225:72-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.05990.x.
10
The development and validation of sensory and emotional scales of touch perception.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2011 Feb;73(2):531-50. doi: 10.3758/s13414-010-0037-y.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验