Ackerley Rochelle, Hassan Eusra, Curran Andrew, Wessberg Johan, Olausson Håkan, McGlone Francis
Department of Physiology, University of Gothenburg Gothenburg, Sweden.
Front Behav Neurosci. 2012 Aug 7;6:51. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2012.00051. eCollection 2012.
Active, self-touch and the passive touch from an external source engage comparable afferent mechanoreceptors on the touched skin site. However, touch directed to glabrous skin compared to hairy skin will activate different types of afferent mechanoreceptors. Despite perceptual similarities between touch to different body sites, it is likely that the touch information is processed differently. In the present study, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to elucidate the cortical differences in the neural signal of touch representations during active, self-touch and passive touch from another, to both glabrous (palm) and hairy (arm) skin, where a soft brush was used as the stimulus. There were two active touch conditions, where the participant used the brush in their right hand to stroke either their left palm or arm. There were two similar passive, touch conditions where the experimenter used an identical brush to stroke the same palm and arm areas on the participant. Touch on the left palm elicited a large, significant, positive blood-oxygenation level dependence (BOLD) signal in right sensorimotor areas. Less extensive activity was found for touch to the arm. Separate somatotopical palm and arm representations were found in Brodmann area (BA) 3 of the right primary somatosensory cortex (SI) and in both these areas, active stroking gave significantly higher signals than passive stroking. Active, self-touch elicited a positive BOLD signal in a network of sensorimotor cortical areas in the left hemisphere, compared to the resting baseline. In contrast, during passive touch, a significant negative BOLD signal was found in the left SI. Thus, each of the four conditions had a unique cortical signature despite similarities in afferent signaling or evoked perception. It is hypothesized that attentional mechanisms play a role in the modulation of the touch signal in the right SI, accounting for the differences found between active and passive touch.
主动的自我触摸以及来自外部源的被动触摸会激活被触摸皮肤部位上类似的传入机械感受器。然而,与有毛皮肤相比,触摸无毛皮肤会激活不同类型的传入机械感受器。尽管触摸不同身体部位在感知上有相似之处,但触摸信息的处理方式可能有所不同。在本研究中,我们使用功能磁共振成像(fMRI)来阐明在主动、自我触摸以及来自他人的被动触摸过程中,针对无毛(手掌)和有毛(手臂)皮肤,使用软刷作为刺激时,触摸表征的神经信号在皮层上的差异。有两种主动触摸情况,参与者用右手拿着刷子抚摸自己的左手掌或手臂。有两种类似的被动触摸情况,实验者用相同的刷子抚摸参与者相同的手掌和手臂区域。触摸左手掌在右侧感觉运动区域引发了一个大的、显著的、正的血氧水平依赖(BOLD)信号。触摸手臂时发现的活动范围较小。在右侧初级躯体感觉皮层(SI)的布罗德曼区(BA)3中发现了单独的躯体感觉手掌和手臂表征,并且在这两个区域中,主动抚摸产生的信号明显高于被动抚摸。与静息基线相比,主动的自我触摸在左半球的感觉运动皮层区域网络中引发了一个正的BOLD信号。相比之下,在被动触摸期间,在左侧SI中发现了一个显著的负BOLD信号。因此,尽管传入信号或诱发感知存在相似之处,但这四种情况中的每一种都有独特的皮层特征。据推测,注意力机制在右侧SI中触摸信号的调制中起作用,这解释了主动触摸和被动触摸之间的差异。