• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较头孢他啶和美罗培南治疗儿童癌症患者发热性中性粒细胞减少症的疗效。

Comparing the efficacy of ceftazidime and meropenem in treatment of febrile neutropenia in pediatric patients with cancer.

作者信息

Ferdosian F, Ghiliyan R, Hashemi A, Akhondzadeh B, Gholampoor E

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Science and Health Services, Yazd, Iran.

Internal Medicine. Hematology oncology and Genetics Research Center Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences and Health Services, Yazd, Iran.

出版信息

Iran J Ped Hematol Oncol. 2013;3(3):103-7. Epub 2013 Jul 22.

PMID:24575280
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3921881/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In cancer patients, various infections were developed due to severe neutropenia resulted from chemotherapy. Ceftazidime is commonly used as monotherapy of cancer patients with fever and neutropenia. Meropenem is a new carbapenem with more extended antibacterial spectrum including anaerobes. It provides better coverage against gram positives. This trial compared the efficacy and safety of meropenem with ceftazidime as empirical monotherapy for febrile neutropenia in pediatric patients with cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective, double-blind, randomized clinical trial was conducted at Departments of Pediatric Haematology/Oncology, University Hospitals, Yazd, Iran, during the years 2012 to 2013. A total of 48 cancer patients participated in the trial.

RESULT

In this study, 26 patients (54.16%) were treated by ceftazidime and 22 patients (45.84%) by meropenem. Mean duration of fever in those who responded to treatment in ceftazidime group was 19.43+/-31.04 hours, and in meropenem group was 16.53+/-28.77 hours (P-value = 0.965).

CONCLUSION

Finding of this study indicate that ceftazidime and meropenem have similar efficacy in treatment of fever and sever neutropenia. Due to more availability and lower cost of ceftazidime than meropenem, ceftazidime is suggested as a first line treatment in fever and neutropenia.

摘要

背景

在癌症患者中,化疗导致的严重中性粒细胞减少会引发各种感染。头孢他啶通常用作癌症发热伴中性粒细胞减少患者的单一疗法。美罗培南是一种新型碳青霉烯类药物,抗菌谱更广,包括厌氧菌,对革兰氏阳性菌的覆盖性更好。本试验比较了美罗培南与头孢他啶作为经验性单一疗法治疗儿童癌症患者发热性中性粒细胞减少的疗效和安全性。

材料与方法

2012年至2013年期间,在伊朗亚兹德大学医院儿科血液学/肿瘤学部门进行了一项前瞻性、双盲、随机临床试验。共有48名癌症患者参与了该试验。

结果

在本研究中,26名患者(54.16%)接受了头孢他啶治疗,22名患者(45.84%)接受了美罗培南治疗。头孢他啶组治疗有反应患者的平均发热持续时间为19.43±31.04小时,美罗培南组为16.53±28.77小时(P值 = 0.965)。

结论

本研究结果表明,头孢他啶和美罗培南在治疗发热和严重中性粒细胞减少方面疗效相似。由于头孢他啶比美罗培南更易获得且成本更低,建议将头孢他啶作为发热和中性粒细胞减少的一线治疗药物。

相似文献

1
Comparing the efficacy of ceftazidime and meropenem in treatment of febrile neutropenia in pediatric patients with cancer.比较头孢他啶和美罗培南治疗儿童癌症患者发热性中性粒细胞减少症的疗效。
Iran J Ped Hematol Oncol. 2013;3(3):103-7. Epub 2013 Jul 22.
2
Comparison of meropenem with ceftazidime as monotherapy of cancer patients with chemotherapy induced febrile neutropenia.美罗培南与头孢他啶单药治疗化疗引起的发热性中性粒细胞减少症癌症患者的比较。
J Pak Med Assoc. 2002 Jan;52(1):15-8.
3
Meropenem versus ceftazidime in the treatment of cancer patients with febrile neutropenia: a randomized, double-blind trial.美罗培南与头孢他啶治疗癌症发热性中性粒细胞减少症患者的随机双盲试验
J Clin Oncol. 2000 Nov 1;18(21):3690-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2000.18.21.3690.
4
Meropenem versus ceftazidime as empirical monotherapy in febrile neutropenia of paediatric patients with cancer.美罗培南与头孢他啶作为癌症患儿发热性中性粒细胞减少症经验性单药治疗的比较
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2001 Jun;47(6):841-53. doi: 10.1093/jac/47.6.841.
5
Equivalent efficacies of meropenem and ceftazidime as empirical monotherapy of febrile neutropenic patients. The Meropenem Study Group of Leuven, London and Nijmegen.美罗培南与头孢他啶作为发热性中性粒细胞减少患者经验性单药治疗的等效疗效。鲁汶、伦敦和奈梅亨美罗培南研究小组。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1995 Jul;36(1):185-200. doi: 10.1093/jac/36.1.185.
6
Meropenem monotherapy versus combination therapy with ceftazidime and amikacin for empirical treatment of febrile neutropenic patients.美罗培南单药治疗与头孢他啶联合阿米卡星治疗对发热性中性粒细胞减少患者的经验性治疗
Ann Hematol. 1998 Feb;76(2):73-80. doi: 10.1007/s002770050366.
7
Monotherapy with meropenem versus combination therapy with ceftazidime plus amikacin as empirical therapy for neutropenic fever in children with malignancy.美罗培南单药治疗与头孢他啶加阿米卡星联合治疗作为恶性肿瘤患儿中性粒细胞减少性发热的经验性治疗。
J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2003 Dec;36(4):254-9.
8
Empiric monotherapy for febrile neutropenia--a randomized study comparing meropenem with ceftazidime.发热性中性粒细胞减少症的经验性单药治疗——一项比较美罗培南与头孢他啶的随机研究。
Scand J Infect Dis. 1998;30(3):237-43. doi: 10.1080/00365549850160864.
9
Empiric monotherapy in neutropenia: a realistic goal?中性粒细胞减少症的经验性单药治疗:一个现实的目标?
Scand J Infect Dis Suppl. 1995;96:34-7.
10
Meropenem versus ceftazidime plus amikacin in the treatment of febrile episodes in neutropenic patients: a randomized study.美罗培南与头孢他啶加阿米卡星治疗中性粒细胞减少患者发热性疾病的随机研究。
Haematologica. 1997 Nov-Dec;82(6):668-75.

引用本文的文献

1
Recommendations for antibiotic selection for severe nosocomial infections.严重医院获得性感染的抗生素选择建议。
Rev Esp Quimioter. 2021 Oct;34(5):511-524. doi: 10.37201/req/126.2021. Epub 2021 Oct 25.
2
Effect of Combination Therapy of Ceftazidime/Amikacin and Monotherapy with Imipenem on the Treatment of Fever and Neutropenia in Patients with Cancers.头孢他啶/阿米卡星联合治疗与亚胺培南单药治疗对癌症患者发热性中性粒细胞减少症的疗效
Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2018 Aug 18;6(8):1423-1430. doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2018.310. eCollection 2018 Aug 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical experience with three combination regimens for the treatment of high-risk febrile neutropenia.三种联合治疗方案用于治疗高危发热性中性粒细胞减少症的临床经验。
Ann Acad Med Singap. 2006 Jan;35(1):11-6.
2
Monotherapy with meropenem versus combination therapy with ceftazidime plus amikacin as empirical therapy for neutropenic fever in children with malignancy.美罗培南单药治疗与头孢他啶加阿米卡星联合治疗作为恶性肿瘤患儿中性粒细胞减少性发热的经验性治疗。
J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2003 Dec;36(4):254-9.
3
Meropenem versus ceftazidime as empirical monotherapy in febrile neutropenia of paediatric patients with cancer.美罗培南与头孢他啶作为癌症患儿发热性中性粒细胞减少症经验性单药治疗的比较
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2001 Jun;47(6):841-53. doi: 10.1093/jac/47.6.841.
4
Meropenem versus ceftazidime in the treatment of cancer patients with febrile neutropenia: a randomized, double-blind trial.美罗培南与头孢他啶治疗癌症发热性中性粒细胞减少症患者的随机双盲试验
J Clin Oncol. 2000 Nov 1;18(21):3690-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2000.18.21.3690.
5
Meropenem versus ceftazidime as empirical monotherapy for febrile neutropenic cancer patients.美罗培南与头孢他啶作为发热性中性粒细胞减少癌症患者的经验性单药治疗
Ann Hematol. 2000 Mar;79(3):152-7. doi: 10.1007/s002770050571.
6
A comparative study of cefepime versus ceftazidime as empiric therapy of febrile episodes in neutropenic patients.头孢吡肟与头孢他啶作为中性粒细胞减少患者发热期经验性治疗的比较研究。
Chemotherapy. 1999 Sep-Oct;45(5):370-9. doi: 10.1159/000007228.
7
Randomized prospective study comparing cost-effectiveness of teicoplanin and vancomycin as second-line empiric therapy for infection in neutropenic patients.比较替考拉宁和万古霉素作为中性粒细胞减少患者感染二线经验性治疗的成本效益的随机前瞻性研究。
Haematologica. 1999 Mar;84(3):231-6.
8
Cost-effectiveness of ceftazidime or imipenem/cilastatin versus ceftriaxone + aminoglycoside in the treatment of febrile episodes in neutropenic cancer patients in Germany.德国头孢他啶或亚胺培南/西司他丁与头孢曲松+氨基糖苷类药物治疗中性粒细胞减少癌症患者发热性发作的成本效益
Infection. 1999 Jan-Feb;27(1):23-7. doi: 10.1007/BF02565166.
9
Empiric monotherapy for febrile neutropenia--a randomized study comparing meropenem with ceftazidime.发热性中性粒细胞减少症的经验性单药治疗——一项比较美罗培南与头孢他啶的随机研究。
Scand J Infect Dis. 1998;30(3):237-43. doi: 10.1080/00365549850160864.
10
Empiric therapy for the febrile neutropenic patient. Design bias.
Support Care Cancer. 1998 Sep;6(5):449-56. doi: 10.1007/s005200050193.