Worni Andreas, Kolgeci Lumni, Rentsch-Kollar Andrea, Katsoulis Joannis, Mericske-Stern Regina
Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015 Dec;17(6):1073-81. doi: 10.1111/cid.12214. Epub 2014 Feb 27.
Little information is yet available on zirconia-based prostheses supported by implants.
To evaluate technical problems and failures of implant-supported zirconia-based prostheses with exclusive screw-retention.
Consecutive patients received screw-retained zirconia-based prostheses supported by implants and were followed over a time period of 5 years. The implant placement and prosthetic rehabilitation were performed in one clinical setting, and all patients participated in the maintenance program. The treatment comprised single crowns (SCs) and fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) of three to 12 units. Screw-retention of the CAD/CAM-fabricated SCs and FDPs was performed with direct connection at the implant level. The primary outcome was the complete failure of zirconia-based prostheses; outcome measures were fracture of the framework or extensive chipping resulting in the need for refabrication. A life table analysis was performed, the cumulative survival rate (CSR) calculated, and a Kaplan-Meier curve drawn.
Two hundred and ninety-four implants supported 156 zirconia-based prostheses in 95 patients (52 men, 43 women, average age 59.1 ± 11.7 years). Sixty-five SCs and 91 FDPs were identified, comprising a total of 441 units. Fractures of the zirconia framework and extensive chipping resulted in refabrication of nine prostheses. Nearly all the prostheses (94.2%) remained in situ during the observation period. The 5-year CSR was 90.5%, and 41 prostheses (14 SCs, 27 FDPs) comprising 113 units survived for an observation time of more than 5 years. Six SCs exhibited screw loosening, and polishing of minor chipping was required for five prostheses.
This study shows that zirconia-based implant-supported fixed prostheses exhibit satisfactory treatment outcomes and that screw-retention directly at the implant level is feasible.
关于种植体支持的氧化锆基修复体的信息尚少。
评估采用单纯螺丝固位的种植体支持的氧化锆基修复体的技术问题及失败情况。
连续纳入接受种植体支持的螺丝固位氧化锆基修复体的患者,并对其进行为期5年的随访。种植体植入和修复体康复在同一临床机构进行,所有患者均参与维护计划。治疗包括单冠(SCs)和3至12单位的固定义齿(FDPs)。计算机辅助设计/计算机辅助制造(CAD/CAM)制作的SCs和FDPs通过在种植体水平直接连接进行螺丝固位。主要结局为氧化锆基修复体的完全失败;结局指标为支架折断或广泛崩瓷导致需要重新制作。进行寿命表分析,计算累积生存率(CSR),并绘制Kaplan-Meier曲线。
95例患者(52例男性,43例女性,平均年龄59.1±11.7岁)的294枚种植体支持156个氧化锆基修复体。共识别出65个SCs和91个FDPs,共计441个单位。氧化锆支架折断和广泛崩瓷导致9个修复体重新制作。在观察期内,几乎所有修复体(94.2%)均保留在位。5年CSR为90.5%,41个修复体(14个SCs,27个FDPs)共113个单位存活超过5年的观察时间。6个SCs出现螺丝松动,5个修复体需要对轻微崩瓷进行打磨。
本研究表明,种植体支持氧化锆基固定修复体具有令人满意的治疗效果,且在种植体水平直接进行螺丝固位是可行的。