Mokhtarpour Hadi, Eftekhar Ashtiani Reza, Mahshid Minoo, Tabatabaian Farhad, Alikhasi Marzieh
Assistant Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Sari University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
Assistant Professor, Department of Dental Technology, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2016;10(3):181-8. doi: 10.15171/joddd.2016.029. Epub 2016 Aug 17.
Background. Fracture load of implant-supported restorations is an important factor in clinical success. This study evaluated the effect of two techniques for screw access hole preparation on the fracture load of cement-screw-retained implant-supported zirconia-based crowns. Methods. Thirty similar cement-screw-retained implant-supported zirconia-based maxillary central incisor crowns were evaluated in three groups of 10. Group NH: with no screw access holes for the control; Group HBS: with screw access holes prepared with a machine before zirconia sintering; Group HAS: with screw access holes prepared manually after zirconia sintering. In group HBS, the access holes were virtually designed and prepared by a computer-assisted design/computer-assisted manufacturing system. In group HAS, the access holes were manually prepared after zirconia sintering using a diamond bur. The dimensions of the screw access holes were equal in both groups. The crowns were cemented onto same-size abutments and were then subjected to thermocycling. The fracture load values of the crowns were measured using a universal testing machine. Data were analyzed with ANOVA and Tukey test (P < 0.05). Results. The mean fracture load value for the group NH was 888.37 ± 228.92 N, which was the highest among the groups, with a significant difference (P < 0.0001). The fracture load values were 610.48 ± 125.02 N and 496.74 ± 104.10 Nin the HBS and HAS groups, respectively, with no significant differences (P = 0.44). Conclusion. Both techniques used for preparation of screw access holes in implant-supported zirconia-based crowns decreased the fracture load.
背景。种植体支持修复体的断裂载荷是临床成功的一个重要因素。本研究评估了两种螺丝通道制备技术对粘结 - 螺丝固位的种植体支持氧化锆基牙冠断裂载荷的影响。方法。30颗相似的粘结 - 螺丝固位的种植体支持上颌中切牙氧化锆基牙冠被分为三组,每组10颗。NH组:作为对照组无螺丝通道;HBS组:在氧化锆烧结前用机器制备螺丝通道;HAS组:在氧化锆烧结后手工制备螺丝通道。在HBS组中,通道由计算机辅助设计/计算机辅助制造系统进行虚拟设计和制备。在HAS组中,氧化锆烧结后用金刚砂车针手工制备通道。两组螺丝通道尺寸相同。牙冠粘结到相同尺寸的基台上,然后进行热循环。使用万能试验机测量牙冠的断裂载荷值。数据采用方差分析和Tukey检验进行分析(P < 0.05)。结果。NH组的平均断裂载荷值为888.37 ± 228.92 N,是各组中最高的,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.0001)。HBS组和HAS组的断裂载荷值分别为610.48 ± 125.02 N和496.74 ± 104.10 N,差异无统计学意义(P = 0.44)。结论。用于种植体支持氧化锆基牙冠螺丝通道制备的两种技术均降低了断裂载荷。