Yoneda Toshiyuki
Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
Clin Calcium. 2014 Mar;24(3):407-15.
It has been passed 10 years since the first article of bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (BRONJ) was reported in 2003. During this period of time, turmoil and confusion initially seen in physicians, dentists and patients in the management of BRONJ have been gradually and significantly settling and preventive methods for BRONJ have been developed to some extent due to the accumulation of substantial amounts of information and clinical experience. Further, Japanese version of position paper for BRONJ that suggests unified view of the pathophysiology of BRONJ and consistent treatments of BRONJ was published in 2010 and 2012. However, the mechanism and pathophysiology of BRONJ still remain elusive. The recognition for BRONJ is still inconsistent between physicians and dentists. It is also noted that a new anti-resorptive drug denosumab is associated with ONJ. Thus, there are still lots to learn and study. In this chapter current our understanding of BRONJ will be described.
自2003年第一篇关于双膦酸盐相关颌骨坏死(BRONJ)的文章发表以来,已经过去了10年。在此期间,医生、牙医和患者在BRONJ管理方面最初看到的混乱和困惑已逐渐显著平息,并且由于大量信息和临床经验的积累,BRONJ的预防方法已在一定程度上得到发展。此外,2010年和2012年发表了BRONJ的日文版立场文件,该文件提出了BRONJ病理生理学的统一观点以及BRONJ的一致治疗方法。然而,BRONJ的机制和病理生理学仍然难以捉摸。医生和牙医对BRONJ的认识仍然不一致。还应注意的是,一种新型抗吸收药物地诺单抗与ONJ有关。因此,仍有许多需要学习和研究的地方。在本章中,将描述我们目前对BRONJ的理解。