Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Ann Pharmacother. 2014 May;48(5):596-600. doi: 10.1177/1060028014524375. Epub 2014 Feb 27.
Several equations are used to predict lithium doses necessary to attain therapeutic serum concentrations. A number of studies have evaluated these equations; however, few equations were compared simultaneously.
To assess the accuracy and precision of published dosing equations in predicting daily lithium doses and to evaluate if pertinent laboratory tests were performed prior to initiation.
A retrospective analysis was performed of patients who received lithium at the Medical University of South Carolina Institute of Psychiatry between July 2010 and July 2012. Using dosing equations, expected lithium doses were calculated based on corresponding serum concentrations identified in patient charts. Expected doses were then compared with actual lithium doses. The primary end point was to assess the accuracy and precision of dosing equations using mean differences in daily lithium doses and standard deviations. Secondary end points included presence of pertinent laboratory tests and use of concomitant interacting drugs .
Of 155 patients identified, 59 were eligible for analysis. Equations developed by Abou-Auda et al and Pepin et al did not predict doses that were significantly different from actual doses. Conversely, equations by Jermain et al, Terao et al, and Zetinet al did predict statistically different doses.
Abou-Auda et al developed a predictive lithium dosing equation that was more accurate than equations developed by Jermain et al, Terao et al, and Zetin et al and more precise than the Pepin et al equation. Further study evaluating the influence of equations on clinical outcomes is warranted.
有几种方程可用于预测达到治疗性血清浓度所需的锂剂量。已经有许多研究评估了这些方程;然而,很少有方程同时进行比较。
评估已发表的给药方程预测每日锂剂量的准确性和精密度,并评估在开始治疗前是否进行了相关的实验室检查。
对 2010 年 7 月至 2012 年 7 月在南卡罗来纳医科大学精神病学研究所接受锂治疗的患者进行回顾性分析。使用给药方程,根据患者图表中确定的相应血清浓度计算预期的锂剂量。然后将预期剂量与实际锂剂量进行比较。主要终点是评估给药方程的准确性和精密度,方法是比较每日锂剂量的平均差异和标准差。次要终点包括是否存在相关实验室检查和使用伴随的相互作用药物。
在确定的 155 例患者中,有 59 例符合分析条件。由 Abou-Auda 等人和 Pepin 等人开发的方程无法预测与实际剂量显著不同的剂量。相反,由 Jermain 等人、Terao 等人和 Zetinet 等人开发的方程确实预测了统计学上不同的剂量。
Abou-Auda 等人开发的预测性锂给药方程比 Jermain 等人、Terao 等人和 Zetinet 等人开发的方程更准确,比 Pepin 等人的方程更精确。需要进一步研究评估这些方程对临床结果的影响。