Klinik für Anästhesiologie und Operative Intensivmedizin, Universitä tsklinikum Köln, 50924, Cologne, Germany,
Eur J Health Econ. 2002 Jun;3(2):111-9. doi: 10.1007/s10198-002-0097-6.
The fentanyl transdermal therapeutic system (fentanyl-TTS;Durogesic) has a distinct route of administration and safety profile compared with other opioids used in the treatment of moderate to severe pain.These aspects are likely to have an impact on patient acceptance and functioning as well as efficacy. We compared the cost-utility of fentanyl-TTS and controlled-release morphine (cr-morphine) in the treatment of moderate to severe nonmalignant pain in outpatients in Germany. A 1-year, three-phased decisionanalytic model was constructed, incorporating estimates of a variety of aspects of pain control.Use of fentanyl-TTS was predicted to incur higher costs than cr-morphine over 1 year of treatment (DM 6950 vs.DM 6186, respectively) but was associated with a higher number of quality-adjusted life days (234 vs. 216, respectively), thus achieving an incremental cost-utility ratio of DM 15,960 per quality-adjusted life-year gained.The results of the decision-analytic model support the use of fentanyl-TTS as a favorable cost-effective option for the treatment of moderate to severe nonmalignant pain.
芬太尼透皮治疗贴(多瑞吉)与用于治疗中重度疼痛的其它阿片类药物相比,具有独特的给药途径和安全性特征。这些方面可能会对患者的接受程度和功能以及疗效产生影响。我们在德国对门诊中使用芬太尼透皮治疗贴和控释吗啡(cr-吗啡)治疗中重度非恶性疼痛的成本-效果进行了比较。构建了一个为期 1 年的三阶段决策分析模型,纳入了对疼痛控制各个方面的估计。在 1 年的治疗期间,芬太尼透皮治疗贴的使用预计比控释吗啡的成本更高(分别为 6950 德国马克和 6186 德国马克),但与更高数量的质量调整生命天数相关(分别为 234 天和 216 天),因此,每获得一个质量调整生命年的增量成本效果比为 15960 德国马克。决策分析模型的结果支持将芬太尼透皮治疗贴作为治疗中重度非恶性疼痛的一种有利的具有成本效果的选择。