• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

芬太尼透皮贴剂治疗慢性中度至重度疼痛的经济学评价。

Economic evaluation of the fentanyl transdermal system for the treatment of chronic moderate to severe pain.

作者信息

Neighbors D M, Bell T J, Wilson J, Dodd S L

机构信息

Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle, NC 27709, USA.

出版信息

J Pain Symptom Manage. 2001 Feb;21(2):129-43. doi: 10.1016/s0885-3924(00)00247-5.

DOI:10.1016/s0885-3924(00)00247-5
PMID:11226764
Abstract

The fentanyl transdermal system (Duragesic) is an opioid analgesic indicated for the management of chronic moderate to severe pain. The purpose of this analysis is to estimate its economic value compared to two long-acting oral opioids. A cost-utility analysis was performed using a three-phased decision analytic model. The transdermal system had the highest expected cost during the first year of therapy ($2,491), moderately higher than the cost of a year of therapy with controlled-release morphine ($2,037) or controlled-release oxycodone ($2,307). The system also had the highest expected number of quality-adjusted life-days (QALDs) (244 compared to 236 for morphine and 231 for oxycodone), despite conservative assumptions. The fentanyl transdermal system achieved incremental cost-utility ratios of $20,709 (vs. morphine) and $5,273 (vs. oxycodone) per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. In a conservative modeled analysis, the fentanyl transdermal system led to increased QALDs at a nominal increased cost. In the absence of head-to-head clinical trials, models help clarify cost and outcome trade-offs and provide a consistent theoretical framework for use by individual decisionmakers.

摘要

芬太尼透皮贴剂(多瑞吉)是一种阿片类镇痛药,适用于治疗慢性中度至重度疼痛。本分析的目的是评估其与两种长效口服阿片类药物相比的经济价值。使用三阶段决策分析模型进行了成本效用分析。在治疗的第一年,透皮贴剂的预期成本最高(2491美元),略高于缓释吗啡一年治疗成本(2037美元)或缓释羟考酮一年治疗成本(2307美元)。尽管采用了保守假设,但该系统的质量调整生命天数(QALD)预期数量也最高(244天,相比之下吗啡为236天,羟考酮为231天)。每获得一个质量调整生命年(QALY),芬太尼透皮贴剂与吗啡相比的增量成本效用比为20709美元,与羟考酮相比为5273美元。在一项保守的模型分析中,芬太尼透皮贴剂在成本名义上增加的情况下导致QALD增加。在缺乏直接对比临床试验的情况下,模型有助于阐明成本和结果的权衡,并为个体决策者提供一个一致的理论框架。

相似文献

1
Economic evaluation of the fentanyl transdermal system for the treatment of chronic moderate to severe pain.芬太尼透皮贴剂治疗慢性中度至重度疼痛的经济学评价。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2001 Feb;21(2):129-43. doi: 10.1016/s0885-3924(00)00247-5.
2
Economic evaluation of Durogesic in moderate to severe, nonmalignant, chronic pain in Germany.德国度洛西汀用于中重度非恶性慢性疼痛的经济学评估。
Eur J Health Econ. 2006 Dec;7(4):290-6. doi: 10.1007/s10198-006-0376-8.
3
Patient-reported utilization patterns of fentanyl transdermal system and oxycodone hydrochloride controlled-release among patients with chronic nonmalignant pain.慢性非恶性疼痛患者中芬太尼透皮系统和盐酸羟考酮控释片的患者报告使用模式。
J Manag Care Pharm. 2003 May-Jun;9(3):223-31. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2003.9.3.223.
4
A comparison of the resources used in advanced cancer care between two different strong opioids: an analysis of naturalistic practice in the UK.两种不同强效阿片类药物在晚期癌症护理中资源使用情况的比较:英国自然主义实践分析
Curr Med Res Opin. 2005 Feb;21(2):271-80. doi: 10.1185/030079904X20312.
5
Opioids and the management of chronic severe pain in the elderly: consensus statement of an International Expert Panel with focus on the six clinically most often used World Health Organization Step III opioids (buprenorphine, fentanyl, hydromorphone, methadone, morphine, oxycodone).阿片类药物与老年人慢性重度疼痛的管理:一个国际专家小组的共识声明,重点关注世界卫生组织第三阶梯临床最常用的六种阿片类药物(丁丙诺啡、芬太尼、氢吗啡酮、美沙酮、吗啡、羟考酮)。
Pain Pract. 2008 Jul-Aug;8(4):287-313. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2008.00204.x. Epub 2008 May 23.
6
Therapy switching in patients receiving long-acting opioids.接受长效阿片类药物治疗的患者的治疗转换
Ann Pharmacother. 2004 Mar;38(3):389-95. doi: 10.1345/aph.1D109. Epub 2004 Jan 12.
7
Randomised crossover trial of transdermal fentanyl and sustained release oral morphine for treating chronic non-cancer pain.经皮芬太尼与缓释口服吗啡治疗慢性非癌性疼痛的随机交叉试验
BMJ. 2001 May 12;322(7295):1154-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7295.1154.
8
Factors predicting requirement of high-dose transdermal fentanyl in opioid switching from oral morphine or oxycodone in patients with cancer pain.预测癌症疼痛患者从口服吗啡或羟考酮转换为使用芬太尼透皮贴剂时需要高剂量的因素。
Clin J Pain. 2011 Oct;27(8):664-7. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e3182168fed.
9
Clinical experience with transdermal and orally administered opioids in palliative care patients--a retrospective study.姑息治疗患者经皮和口服阿片类药物的临床经验——一项回顾性研究。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2007 Apr;37(4):302-9. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hym017. Epub 2007 May 22.
10
Sustained-release oral morphine versus transdermal fentanyl and oral methadone in cancer pain management.缓释口服吗啡与透皮芬太尼及口服美沙酮在癌症疼痛管理中的比较
Eur J Pain. 2008 Nov;12(8):1040-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2008.01.013. Epub 2008 Mar 18.

引用本文的文献

1
An evaluation of the adequacy of Indian national and state essential medicines lists (EMLs) for palliative care medical needs-a comparative analysis.印度国家和邦基本药物清单对姑息治疗医疗需求的充足性评估——一项比较分析
Ecancermedicalscience. 2025 Feb 5;19:1837. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2025.1837. eCollection 2025.
2
Molecular Basis of Cancer Pain Management: An Updated Review.癌症疼痛管理的分子基础:最新综述
Medicina (Kaunas). 2019 Sep 12;55(9):584. doi: 10.3390/medicina55090584.
3
Fentanyl Formulations in the Management of Pain: An Update.
芬太尼制剂在疼痛管理中的应用:更新。
Drugs. 2017 May;77(7):747-763. doi: 10.1007/s40265-017-0727-z.
4
Economic evaluation in chronic pain: a systematic review and de novo flexible economic model.慢性疼痛的经济评估:系统评价与全新的灵活经济模型
Eur J Health Econ. 2016 Jul;17(6):755-70. doi: 10.1007/s10198-015-0720-y. Epub 2015 Sep 16.
5
Differences between opioids: pharmacological, experimental, clinical and economical perspectives.阿片类药物的差异:药理学、实验、临床和经济学角度。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2013 Jan;75(1):60-78. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2012.04317.x.
6
Pharmacoeconomic impact of adverse events of long-term opioid treatment for the management of persistent pain.长期阿片类药物治疗慢性疼痛的不良反应对药物经济学的影响。
Clin Drug Investig. 2011;31(2):73-86. doi: 10.1007/BF03256935.
7
Formulations of fentanyl for the management of pain.芬太尼制剂用于疼痛管理。
Drugs. 2010;70(1):57-72. doi: 10.2165/11531740-000000000-00000.
8
Cost-effectiveness analysis of a lidocaine 5% medicated plaster compared with gabapentin and pregabalin for treating postherpetic neuralgia: a german perspective.5%利多卡因药用贴剂与加巴喷丁和普瑞巴林治疗带状疱疹后神经痛的成本效益分析:德国视角
Clin Drug Investig. 2008;28(9):583-601. doi: 10.2165/00044011-200828090-00005.
9
Benefit-risk assessment of transdermal fentanyl for the treatment of chronic pain.透皮芬太尼治疗慢性疼痛的获益-风险评估。
Drug Saf. 2003;26(13):951-73. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200326130-00004.