Sirois François
1020, de Bougainville, Québec, QC, G1S3A8, Canada.
Int J Psychoanal. 2014 Apr;95(2):271-89. doi: 10.1111/1745-8315.12146. Epub 2014 Mar 3.
This paper presents a re-evaluation of Kris's personal myth. The notion has been used rather sparingly despite the Delphi Symposium in 1984 on the question of its clinical usefulness. After framing the notion of myth, some difficulties related to the question are identified. A clinical vignette exemplifies some of the ambiguities in its definition but stresses its clinical relevance. A discussion expands on these situations so as to propose three various aspects of personal myths to account for the two variants identified by Kris. The actualization of the underlying fantasy in the character organization is a third form and the technical aspect associated with it is reviewed from a new perspective. The family romance is revisited to reassess its role as the basis of the personal myth in the face of studies favouring an earlier development of the myth.
本文对克里斯的个人神话概念进行了重新评估。尽管1984年曾就其临床实用性问题召开过德尔菲研讨会,但该概念的使用一直较为有限。在阐述了神话的概念之后,本文指出了与该问题相关的一些难点。一个临床案例说明了其定义中的一些模糊之处,但强调了其临床相关性。通过讨论对这些情况进行了拓展,从而提出了个人神话的三个不同方面,以解释克里斯所确定的两种变体。性格结构中潜在幻想的实现是第三种形式,并从新的角度审视了与之相关的技术层面。本文重新审视了家族罗曼史,以在支持神话更早发展的研究背景下,重新评估其作为个人神话基础的作用。