Guérit J M, Monje Argiles A
Unité d'Explorations Neurophysiologiques du Système Nerveux, Université Catholique de Louvain, Cliniques Universitaires St. Luc, Brussels, Belgium.
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1988 Sep;70(3):230-8. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(88)90083-1.
Since magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has proved to be a valuable method in assessing multiple sclerosis (MS) patients, some studies have aimed at comparing the sensitivities of MRI, multimodality evoked potentials (MEPs) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis for oligoclonal banding, with somewhat conflicting results. It is suggested that these differences can be largely explained by the criteria used for patient incorporation, on the one hand, and by the way of recording MEPs, on the other. This hypothesis is confirmed by the present study which shows that, when only patients with definite MS are selected, and with optimal conditions of MEP recording (norms adapted to patient parameters, use of several spatial frequencies, combined stimulation of median and posterior tibial nerves), the sensitivities of MRI, MEPs and CSF are high and do not significantly differ from each other.
由于磁共振成像(MRI)已被证明是评估多发性硬化症(MS)患者的一种有价值的方法,一些研究旨在比较MRI、多模式诱发电位(MEP)和脑脊液(CSF)分析检测寡克隆带的敏感性,结果有些相互矛盾。有人认为,一方面,这些差异很大程度上可以通过纳入患者的标准来解释,另一方面,可以通过记录MEP的方式来解释。本研究证实了这一假设,该研究表明,当仅选择确诊为MS的患者,并且在MEP记录的最佳条件下(根据患者参数调整规范、使用多个空间频率、联合刺激正中神经和胫后神经),MRI、MEP和CSF的敏感性很高,且彼此之间无显著差异。