Thirioux B, Mercier M R, Blanke O, Berthoz A
Laboratoire de Physiologie de la Perception et de l'Action, Collège de France/UMR 7152 CNRS, 11 Place Marcelin Berthelot, 75005 Paris, France; Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience, Brain-Mind Institute, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience, Brain-Mind Institute, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Neuroscience. 2014 May 16;267:286-306. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.02.024. Epub 2014 Feb 26.
Although extensively investigated in socio-cognitive neuroscience, empathy is difficult to study. The first difficulty originates in its multifaceted nature. According to the multidimensional model, empathy combines emotional, automatic (simulation), cognitive (mentalizing) and regulatory (executive functions) processes. Substantial functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data demonstrated that co-activations in the mirror neuron system (MNS) and mentalizing network (MENT) sustain this co-recruitment of so-called first- and second-person-like processes. Because of the poor temporal resolution of fMRI techniques, we currently lack evidence about the precise timing of the MNS-MENT combination. An important challenge is, thus, to disentangle how MNS and MENT dynamically work together along time in empathy. Moreover, the role of the executive functions in the MNS-MENT combination time course is still unknown. Second, empathy - feeling into - is closely related to sympathy - feeling with - and both phenomena are often conflated in experimental studies on intersubjectivity. In this electrical neuroimaging (EEG) pilot-study, we tested whether the egocentered vs. heterocentered visuo-spatial mechanisms respectively associated with sympathy and empathy differentially modulate the dynamic combination of the MNS-MENT activations in their respective neural time course. For that, we employed our newly developed behavioral paradigm assessing the visuo-spatial - but not emotional - features of empathy and sympathy. Using a data-driven approach, we report that empathy and sympathy are underlied by sequential activations in the MNS from the insula to the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) between 63ms and 424ms. However, at 333-424ms, empathy triggered greater co-activations in the right IFG and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) (executive functions). Linking together our present and prior (Thirioux et al., 2010) findings from the same dataset, we suggest that this greater recruitment of the right dlPFC monitors the shift from egocentered and first-person-like mechanisms in the MNS to heterocentered and second-person-like mechanisms in the left temporo-parietal junction within the MENT, i.e., reflecting the onset of perspective-change processes in the neural time course of empathy. Contrasting with sympathy, this recruitment of the executive functions could modulate the output end of the mirroring processing in the premotor and sensorimotor cortices.
尽管共情在社会认知神经科学领域已得到广泛研究,但它仍难以进行深入探究。第一个难点源于其多面性。根据多维模型,共情融合了情感、自动(模拟)、认知(心理化)和调节(执行功能)等多种过程。大量功能磁共振成像(fMRI)数据表明,镜像神经元系统(MNS)和心理化网络(MENT)的共同激活维持了这种所谓第一人称和第二人称样过程的共同招募。由于fMRI技术的时间分辨率较差,我们目前缺乏关于MNS - MENT组合精确时间的证据。因此,一个重要的挑战是弄清楚MNS和MENT在共情过程中如何随时间动态协作。此外,执行功能在MNS - MENT组合时间进程中的作用仍然未知。其次,共情(感同身受)与同情(同情某人)密切相关,并且这两种现象在主体间性的实验研究中常常被混淆。在这项脑电图(EEG)初步研究中,我们测试了分别与同情和共情相关的以自我为中心与以他人为中心的视觉空间机制是否会在各自的神经时间进程中对MNS - MENT激活的动态组合产生不同的调节作用。为此,我们采用了新开发的行为范式,该范式评估共情和同情的视觉空间(而非情感)特征。使用数据驱动的方法,我们报告共情和同情是由MNS中从脑岛到额下回(IFG)在63毫秒至424毫秒之间的顺序激活所支撑的。然而,在333 - 424毫秒时,共情在右侧IFG和背外侧前额叶皮层(dlPFC)(执行功能)引发了更强的共同激活。将我们目前和之前(Thirioux等人,2010年)来自同一数据集的研究结果联系起来,我们认为右侧dlPFC的这种更强募集监测了MNS中从以自我为中心和第一人称样机制到MENT中左颞顶联合区以他人为中心和第二人称样机制的转变,即在共情的神经时间进程中反映了视角转换过程的开始。与同情不同,这种执行功能的募集可能会调节运动前区和感觉运动皮层中镜像处理的输出端。