Department of Gastroenterology, Liver Center, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Gastroenterology. 2014 Jul;147(1):152-61. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2014.02.033. Epub 2014 Feb 25.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Little is known about whether the antiviral agent entecavir is more effective than a less potent drug, lamivudine, in reducing the risk of death and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with chronic hepatitis B.
We performed a retrospective analysis of data from 5374 consecutive adult patients with chronic hepatitis B, treated with entecavir (n = 2000) or lamivudine (n = 3374), at a tertiary referral hospital in Seoul, Korea, from November 1, 1999, through December 31, 2011. Data were collected from patients for up to 6 years and analyzed by a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model for the entire cohort and for propensity score-matched cohorts.
During the study period, 302 patients (5.6%) died, 169 (3.1%) received a liver transplant, and 525 (9.8%) developed HCC. Multivariable analyses showed that compared with lamivudine, entecavir therapy was associated with a significantly lower risk of death or transplantation (hazard ratio [HR], 0.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.38-0.64), but a similar risk of HCC (HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.87-1.34). In the 1792 overall propensity-matched pairs, entecavir again was associated with a significantly lower risk of death or transplantation (HR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.37-0.64) and a similar risk of HCC (HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.80-1.27). Entecavir also reduced the risk of death or transplantation, compared with lamivudine, in 860 pairs of patients with cirrhosis (HR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.31-0.57) but there were no differences in risk for HCC (HR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.78-1.28). However, entecavir and lamivudine did not have significantly different effects on clinical outcome in 878 pairs of patients without cirrhosis.
In a retrospective study of 5374 patients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection, entecavir therapy was associated with a significantly lower risk of death or transplantation than lamivudine. However, the drugs did not have different effects on HCC risk.
对于慢性乙型肝炎患者,抗病毒药物恩替卡韦是否比低效力药物拉米夫定更能降低死亡和肝细胞癌(HCC)风险,目前所知甚少。
我们对韩国首尔一家三级转诊医院于 1999 年 11 月 1 日至 2011 年 12 月 31 日期间接受恩替卡韦(n=2000)或拉米夫定(n=3374)治疗的 5374 例连续成年慢性乙型肝炎患者的数据进行了回顾性分析。对患者进行了长达 6 年的数据收集,并通过多变量 Cox 比例风险模型对整个队列和倾向评分匹配队列进行了分析。
在研究期间,有 302 例患者(5.6%)死亡,169 例(3.1%)接受了肝移植,525 例(9.8%)发生 HCC。多变量分析显示,与拉米夫定相比,恩替卡韦治疗与死亡或移植风险显著降低相关(风险比[HR],0.49;95%置信区间[CI],0.38-0.64),但 HCC 风险相似(HR,1.08;95%CI,0.87-1.34)。在 1792 对总体倾向评分匹配的患者中,恩替卡韦再次与死亡或移植风险显著降低相关(HR,0.49;95%CI,0.37-0.64),HCC 风险相似(HR,1.01;95%CI,0.80-1.27)。与拉米夫定相比,恩替卡韦在 860 对肝硬化患者中也降低了死亡或移植风险(HR,0.42;95%CI,0.31-0.57),但 HCC 风险无差异(HR,1.00;95%CI,0.78-1.28)。然而,在 878 对无肝硬化的患者中,恩替卡韦和拉米夫定在临床结局方面并无显著差异。
在对 5374 例慢性乙型肝炎病毒感染患者的回顾性研究中,恩替卡韦治疗与拉米夫定相比,死亡或移植风险显著降低。然而,这两种药物对 HCC 风险没有不同的影响。