Nagai Sonoko, Yokomatsu Takafumi, Tanizawa Kiminobu, Ikezoe Kohei, Handa Tomohiro, Ito Yutaka, Ogino Shunpei, Izumi Takateru
Central Clinic, Clinical Research Center, Japan.
Intern Med. 2014;53(5):427-33. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.53.0794.
Our objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of combination therapy consisting of low-dose corticosteroids with weekly methotrexate in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis in whom long-term therapy is required. Combination therapy was selected because long-term standard corticosteroid therapy tends to result in various adverse effects and the steroid-sparing effects of methotrexate have been reported.
This study was a small open-label study comparing long-term functional changes between patients who received combination therapy (5-15 mg/day of prednisolone and 6 mg/week of methotrexate) and patients who received corticosteroids alone. The comparative analysis was based on the following therapeutic indexes: ejection fraction (EF), left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVDd) on echocardiography, serum N-terminal fragment pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and cardiothoracic ratio (CTR) on plain chest radiographs.
Seventeen patients with cardiac sarcoidosis were examined in the sarcoidosis clinic. Cardiac sarcoidosis was diagnosed based on the Japanese diagnostic guidelines published in 2006.
The EF was significantly stabilized in the combination therapy group but not in the corticosteroids alone group at three years after the first treatment. The CTR and NT-proBNP levels were significantly stabilized in the combination therapy group compared with those observed in the corticosteroids alone group at both three and five years after the first treatment. The LVDd values tended to be stable in the combination therapy group compared with those observed in the corticosteroids alone group. The combination therapy was associated with few adverse effects.
Weekly methotrexate therapy with daily small doses of corticosteroids stabilized the EF, CTR and NT-proBNP levels in the serum without eliciting adverse effects longitudinally.
我们的目的是评估低剂量皮质类固醇与每周一次甲氨蝶呤联合治疗对需要长期治疗的心脏结节病患者的有效性。选择联合治疗是因为长期标准皮质类固醇治疗往往会导致各种不良反应,并且已有报道称甲氨蝶呤具有激素节省作用。
本研究是一项小型开放标签研究,比较接受联合治疗(泼尼松龙5 - 15毫克/天和甲氨蝶呤6毫克/周)的患者与仅接受皮质类固醇治疗的患者之间的长期功能变化。比较分析基于以下治疗指标:超声心动图上的射血分数(EF)、左心室舒张末期直径(LVDd)、血清N末端脑钠肽前体(NT-proBNP)以及胸部X线平片上的心胸比率(CTR)。
17例心脏结节病患者在结节病诊所接受检查。心脏结节病根据2006年发布的日本诊断指南进行诊断。
首次治疗三年后,联合治疗组的EF显著稳定,而仅接受皮质类固醇治疗的组则不然。与首次治疗三年和五年后仅接受皮质类固醇治疗的组相比,联合治疗组的CTR和NT-proBNP水平显著稳定。与仅接受皮质类固醇治疗的组相比,联合治疗组的LVDd值趋于稳定。联合治疗的不良反应较少。
每日小剂量皮质类固醇与每周一次甲氨蝶呤治疗可使血清中的EF、CTR和NT-proBNP水平稳定,且纵向未引发不良反应。