Wasscher Marcel T, Van 't Bosch Johan G
Minstraat 15 bis, 3582 CA Utrecht, The Netherlands; Email:
Newtonplein 62, 2562 JX Den Haag, The Netherlands; Email:
Zootaxa. 2013 Jan 3;3599:19-36. doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.3599.1.2.
Study of rough notes and sketches made by D.C. Geijskes in 1972 and the recently found original drawings by E. de Selys Longchamps done in 1884 from the male syntype of Neoneura bilinearis Selys, 1860, shows the syntype male and female (now lost for several decades) of N. bilinearis refer to the same species later described as Neoneura gaida Rácenis, 1953. Therefore N. gaida is considered a junior synonym of N. bilinearis Selys, 1860. A neotype is chosen for the true N. bilinearis (neotype ?, Suriname, Kabalebo, 15 viii 1965, in RMNH). N. bilinearis sensu Williamson (1917) is redescribed as Neoneura confundens sp. nov. (holotype ?, Suriname, Jodensavanna, Koela-kreek, 13 ii 1946, in RMNH). N. confundens has a wide distribution in South America north of the Tropic of Capricorn, but it is lacking from the central and lower Amazon. It occurs in several color morphs and also varies in male appendage, genital ligula, and female pronotum morphology.
对D.C. 盖伊斯克斯1972年所做的粗略笔记和草图,以及最近发现的E. 德·塞利斯·隆尚普斯于1884年根据1860年双纹新脉蜻(Neoneura bilinearis Selys)雄性模式标本绘制的原始绘图进行研究后发现,双纹新脉蜻的模式标本雄性和雌性(现已丢失数十年)与后来被描述为1953年的盖氏新脉蜻(Neoneura gaida Rácenis)的物种相同。因此,盖氏新脉蜻被视为1860年双纹新脉蜻的次异名。为真正的双纹新脉蜻选定了一个新模标本(新模标本?,苏里南,卡巴莱博,1965年8月15日,存于荷兰国家自然历史博物馆)。威廉姆森(1917年)所定义的双纹新脉蜻被重新描述为混淆新脉蜻(Neoneura confundens sp. nov.)(正模标本?,苏里南,乔登萨凡纳,科埃拉溪,1946年2月13日,存于荷兰国家自然历史博物馆)。混淆新脉蜻在南回归线以北的南美洲分布广泛,但在亚马逊河中游和下游地区没有。它有几种颜色形态,雄性附器、生殖叶和雌性前胸背板形态也有所不同。