Suppr超能文献

整合来自英国国家报告与学习系统的数据与工作领域分析,以了解社区药房中的患者安全事件。

Integrating Data From the UK National Reporting and Learning System With Work Domain Analysis to Understand Patient Safety Incidents in Community Pharmacy.

作者信息

Phipps Denham L, Tam W Vanessa, Ashcroft Darren M

机构信息

From the *Centre for Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety Research, Manchester Pharmacy School, and †NIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

出版信息

J Patient Saf. 2017 Mar;13(1):6-13. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000090.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To explore the combined use of a critical incident database and work domain analysis to understand patient safety issues in a health-care setting.

METHOD

A retrospective review was conducted of incidents reported to the UK National Reporting and Learning System (NRLS) that involved community pharmacy between April 2005 and August 2010. A work domain analysis of community pharmacy was constructed using observational data from 5 community pharmacies, technical documentation, and a focus group with 6 pharmacists. Reports from the NRLS were mapped onto the model generated by the work domain analysis.

RESULTS

Approximately 14,709 incident reports meeting the selection criteria were retrieved from the NRLS. Descriptive statistical analysis of these reports found that almost all of the incidents involved medication and that the most frequently occurring error types were dose/strength errors, incorrect medication, and incorrect formulation. The work domain analysis identified 4 overall purposes for community pharmacy: business viability, health promotion and clinical services, provision of medication, and use of medication. These purposes were served by lower-order characteristics of the work system (such as the functions, processes and objects). The tasks most frequently implicated in the incident reports were those involving medication storage, assembly, or patient medication records.

CONCLUSIONS

Combining the insights from different analytical methods improves understanding of patient safety problems. Incident reporting data can be used to identify general patterns, whereas the work domain analysis can generate information about the contextual factors that surround a critical task.

摘要

目的

探讨如何结合使用关键事件数据库和工作领域分析,以了解医疗环境中的患者安全问题。

方法

对2005年4月至2010年8月期间向英国国家报告与学习系统(NRLS)报告的涉及社区药房的事件进行回顾性审查。利用来自5家社区药房的观察数据、技术文档以及与6名药剂师进行的焦点小组讨论,构建了社区药房的工作领域分析。将NRLS的报告映射到工作领域分析生成的模型上。

结果

从NRLS中检索到约14709份符合选择标准的事件报告。对这些报告的描述性统计分析发现,几乎所有事件都涉及用药,最常出现的错误类型是剂量/强度错误、用药错误和剂型错误。工作领域分析确定了社区药房的4个总体目标:商业可行性、健康促进和临床服务、药品供应以及药品使用。这些目标由工作系统的低阶特征(如功能、流程和对象)来实现。事件报告中最常涉及的任务是那些与药品储存、调配或患者用药记录有关的任务。

结论

结合不同分析方法的见解可增进对患者安全问题的理解。事件报告数据可用于识别一般模式,而工作领域分析可生成有关关键任务周围背景因素的信息。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验