Sihoe Alan D L, Chawla Surbhi, Paul Sohini, Nair Arun, Lee Jesse, Yin Kanhua
Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, The Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong.
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2014 Mar;22(3):319-28. doi: 10.1177/0218492313503641. Epub 2013 Nov 5.
The optimal technique for delivering large tumors during video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy remains uncertain.
In 258 patients receiving video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy for lung cancer, techniques for delivering the resected lobe included complete video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy without rib spreading (n = 206, 80%), resection of a short rib segment (n = 9, 3%), brief rib spreading (n = 12, 5%), and conversion to a minithoracotomy (n = 21, 8%). In 10 (4%) patients, a novel anterior rib cutting technique was used: one rib at the utility port was cut near its anterior end to widen the intercostal space without forcible rib spreading for lobe delivery.
There was no mortality or major morbidity using the anterior rib cutting technique, and it delivered tumors of a larger mean diameter than complete video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy (5.4 ± 3.4 vs. 2.3 ± 1.4 cm, p = 0.017) whilst yielding a similar mean operation time and blood loss to the other non-complete video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy techniques. The anterior rib cutting technique gave similar postoperative patient pain scores and analgesic use to complete video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy, and shorter mean hospital stay than the other non-complete video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy techniques (5.6 ± 2.8 vs. 10.0 ± 7.1 days, p = 0.003).
In video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy, the anterior rib cutting technique is a safe and feasible procedure for delivering large tumors, causing no more pain than complete video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy, and allowing faster recovery than other non-complete video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy techniques.
在电视辅助胸腔镜肺叶切除术中,处理大肿瘤的最佳技术仍不明确。
258例接受电视辅助胸腔镜肺癌肺叶切除术的患者中,切除肺叶的技术包括不撑开肋骨的完全电视辅助胸腔镜肺叶切除术(n = 206,80%)、切除一小段肋骨(n = 9,3%)、短暂撑开肋骨(n = 12,5%)以及转为小切口开胸手术(n = 21,8%)。10例(4%)患者采用了一种新的前肋切断技术:在实用端口处靠近肋骨前端切断一根肋骨,以扩大肋间间隙,无需强行撑开肋骨来取出肺叶。
使用前肋切断技术无死亡病例或严重并发症,与完全电视辅助胸腔镜肺叶切除术相比,该技术能取出平均直径更大的肿瘤(5.4 ± 3.4 vs. 2.3 ± 1.4 cm,p = 0.017),同时手术时间和失血量与其他非完全电视辅助胸腔镜肺叶切除技术相似。前肋切断技术术后患者疼痛评分和镇痛药物使用情况与完全电视辅助胸腔镜肺叶切除术相似,且平均住院时间比其他非完全电视辅助胸腔镜肺叶切除技术短(5.6 ± 2.8 vs. 10.0 ± 7.1天,p = 0.003)。
在电视辅助胸腔镜肺叶切除术中,前肋切断技术是处理大肿瘤的一种安全可行的方法,引起的疼痛不比完全电视辅助胸腔镜肺叶切除术多,且比其他非完全电视辅助胸腔镜肺叶切除技术恢复更快。