Laboratoire d'Éthologie Animale et Humaine EthoS - UMR CNRS 6552, Université de Rennes 1 Paimpont, France.
Laboratoire d'Éthologie Animale et Humaine EthoS - UMR CNRS 6552, Université de Rennes 1 Rennes, France.
Front Psychol. 2014 Feb 13;5:108. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00108. eCollection 2014.
As visual attention is an intrinsic part of social relationships, and because relationships are built on a succession of interactions, their establishment involves learning and attention. The emotional, rewarding or punishing, content can modulate selective attention. In horses, the use of positive/negative reinforcement during training determines short and long-term human-horse relationships. In a recent study in horses, where either food or withers' grooming were used as a reward, it appeared that only the food-rewarded horses learned the task and show better relationship with humans. In the present study, we hypothesized that this differential effect of grooming/food rewards on learning performances could be due to attentional processes. Monitoring, gazes and behaviors directed towards the trainer revealed that the use of a food reward (FR) as positive reinforcement increased horses' selective attention towards their trainer. Conversely, horses trained with grooming reward (GR) expressed more inattentive responses and did not show a decrease of "agitated" behavior. However, individual plotting of attention vs. rate of learning performances revealed a complex pattern. Thus, while all FR horses showed a "window" of attention related to faster learning performances, GR horses' pattern followed an almost normal curve where the extreme animals (i.e., highest and lowest attention) had the slowest learning performances. On the other hand, learning was influenced by attention: at the end of training, the more attentive horses had also better learning performances. This study, based on horses, contributes to the general debate on the place of attentional processes at the interface of emotion and cognition and opens new lines of thought about individual sensitivities (only individuals can tell what an appropriate reward is), attentional processes and learning.
由于视觉注意力是社交关系的内在组成部分,并且关系是建立在一系列互动的基础上的,因此它们的建立涉及到学习和注意力。情绪、奖励或惩罚的内容可以调节选择性注意力。在马中,训练中使用正/负强化决定了人与马的短期和长期关系。在最近对马的一项研究中,使用食物或马肩隆的梳理作为奖励,似乎只有接受食物奖励的马才能学习任务,并与人类建立更好的关系。在本研究中,我们假设梳理/食物奖励对学习表现的这种不同影响可能归因于注意力过程。对驯马师的监控、注视和行为表明,使用食物奖励(FR)作为正强化增加了马对驯马师的选择性注意力。相反,接受梳理奖励(GR)训练的马表现出更多的注意力不集中反应,并且没有表现出“烦躁”行为的减少。然而,对注意力与学习表现率的个体绘图揭示了一种复杂的模式。因此,虽然所有接受 FR 的马都表现出与更快的学习表现相关的“窗口”注意力,但 GR 马的模式遵循几乎正常的曲线,即注意力最高和最低的极端动物的学习表现最慢。另一方面,学习受到注意力的影响:在训练结束时,注意力更高的马也有更好的学习表现。这项基于马的研究有助于一般关于注意力过程在情感和认知界面中的作用的争论,并为个体敏感性(只有个体才能知道什么是适当的奖励)、注意力过程和学习开辟了新的思路。