Ethologie Animale et Humaine, Université Rennes1/UMR-CNRS6552, Station Biologique, Paimpont, France.
PLoS One. 2010 Nov 15;5(11):e15446. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015446.
How do we bond to one another? While in some species, like humans, physical contact plays a role in the process of attachment, it has been suggested that tactile contact's value may greatly differ according to the species considered. Nevertheless, grooming is often considered as a pleasurable experience for domestic animals, even though scientific data is lacking. On another hand, food seems to be involved in the creation of most relationships in a variety of species.
METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: In this study, we used the horse training context to test the effects of food versus grooming during repeated human-horse interactions. The results reveal that food certainly holds a key role in the attachment process, while tactile contact was here clearly insufficient for bonding to occur.
CONCLUSION/SIGNIFICANCE: This study raises important questions on the way tactile contact is perceived, and shows that large inter-species differences are to be expected.
我们如何与彼此建立联系?虽然在某些物种中,例如人类,身体接触在依恋过程中发挥作用,但有人认为,触觉接触的价值可能因所考虑的物种而异。然而,梳理通常被认为是家养动物的一种愉悦体验,尽管缺乏科学数据。另一方面,食物似乎在各种物种的大多数关系的建立中都起着重要作用。
方法/主要发现:在这项研究中,我们使用马训练的背景来测试食物与梳理在重复的人-马互动中的作用。结果表明,食物在依恋过程中肯定起着关键作用,而触觉接触在这里显然不足以产生联系。
结论/意义:这项研究提出了关于触觉接触感知方式的重要问题,并表明预期会存在很大的种间差异。