Suppr超能文献

异基因造血干细胞移植受者原发性抗真菌预防中伊曲康唑长期与短期给药的比较:一项多中心、随机、开放标签试验

Comparison of long-term and short-term administration of itraconazole for primary antifungal prophylaxis in recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a multicenter, randomized, open-label trial.

作者信息

Lin R, Xu X, Li Y, Sun J, Fan Z, Jiang Q, Huang F, Zhou H, Nie D, Guo Z, Mao Y, Xiao Y, Liu Q

机构信息

Department of Hematology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.

出版信息

Transpl Infect Dis. 2014 Apr;16(2):286-94. doi: 10.1111/tid.12192. Epub 2014 Mar 5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The optimal agents and duration of primary antifungal prophylaxis in recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) remain a matter of discussion.

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to compare the efficacy and safety of long-term and short-term administration of itraconazole (ITCZ) for primary antifungal prophylaxis in allo-HSCT recipients.

METHODS

This multicenter, randomized, open-label pilot study was performed in 4 transplant centers in China. Recipients of allo-HSCT without a history of invasive fungal disease (IFD) were randomly assigned to the long-term or the short-term arm. Randomization was carried out by a center computer system. Intravenous ITCZ was given to the patients in both study arms with a loading dose of 400 mg/day for 2 days followed by 200 mg/day until day +14 or when the white blood cell count was >1.0 × 10(9) /L, and then switched to oral ITCZ solution; prophylaxis was continued until day +30 post transplantation in the short-term arm or until day +90 in the long-term arm. The trough serum concentrations of ITCZ also were measured. The primary study endpoint was the incidence of IFD (proven, probable, and possible) within day +90 post transplantation.

RESULTS

A total of 128 recipients were enrolled in this study; 59 of them were randomized to the long-term arm and 62 were randomized to the short-term arm, forming the modified intent-to-treat (mITT) set. The incidence of IFD within day +90, the primary endpoint, was not significantly different between the 2 arms for the mITT set (6.78% in the long-term arm vs. 6.45% in the short-term arm, P = 0.94), or for the per-protocol set (6.90% in the long-term arm vs. 6.67% in the short-term arm, P = 0.96). From day +30 to day +90, the incidence of IFD was 0% and 6.45%, respectively, in the patients with long-term and short-term prophylaxis for the mITT set (P = 0.11). The mean trough serum concentrations of ITCZ was maintained at >500 ng/mL throughout administration. The incidences of withdrawal because of drug-related adverse events in patients with long-term and short-term prophylaxis were 6.78% and 0%, respectively (P = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term and short-term administration of ITCZ both seemed effective in preventing IFD in recipients of allo-HSCT. Further study with large sample size should be performed to evaluate this result. ITCZ shows the same pharmacokinetics in recipients of allo-HSCT as in non-recipients.

摘要

背景

在异基因造血干细胞移植(allo-HSCT)受者中,原发性抗真菌预防的最佳药物和疗程仍存在争议。

目的

我们的目的是比较伊曲康唑(ITCZ)长期和短期给药用于allo-HSCT受者原发性抗真菌预防的疗效和安全性。

方法

这项多中心、随机、开放标签的试点研究在中国的4个移植中心进行。无侵袭性真菌病(IFD)病史的allo-HSCT受者被随机分配至长期组或短期组。随机分组由中心计算机系统完成。两个研究组的患者均接受静脉注射ITCZ,负荷剂量为400mg/天,共2天,随后为200mg/天,直至+14天或白细胞计数>1.0×10⁹/L,然后改为口服ITCZ溶液;短期组预防持续至移植后+30天,长期组持续至+90天。同时测量ITCZ的谷血清浓度。主要研究终点是移植后+90天内IFD(确诊、很可能和可能)的发生率。

结果

本研究共纳入128例受者;其中59例被随机分配至长期组,62例被随机分配至短期组,形成改良意向性治疗(mITT)集。对于mITT集,主要终点即+90天内IFD的发生率在两组之间无显著差异(长期组为6.78%,短期组为6.45%,P = 0.94),按方案集也是如此(长期组为6.90%,短期组为6.67%,P = 0.96)。对于mITT集,从+30天至+90天,长期和短期预防患者的IFD发生率分别为0%和6.45%(P = 0.11)。整个给药过程中ITCZ的平均谷血清浓度维持在>500ng/mL。长期和短期预防患者因药物相关不良事件而停药的发生率分别为6.78%和0%(P = 0.05)。

结论

ITCZ长期和短期给药在预防allo-HSCT受者IFD方面似乎均有效。应进行更大样本量的进一步研究以评估该结果。ITCZ在allo-HSCT受者中的药代动力学与非受者相同。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验